Bravo, non-Puritan Boston!

[Maksutov]

Boston "holiday tree" causes controversy. (http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyID=2005-11-25T225326Z_01_KRA582362_RTRUKOC_0_US-LIFE-TREE.xml&archived=False)

Good for you, Boston. What better name could there be? Definitely an improvement on the "xmas/hanukkah/kwanzaa/solstice/etc./etc." tree.

As usual the fundamentalists continue in their unrelenting attempts to appropriate/hijack everything and anything they (a priori) define as theirs. Stuff it, Falwell!

It's the last day of the Thanksgiving weekend in the United States. Here I will give profound and heartfelt thanks to the founders of this nation for the separation of church and state!

[N C More]

Decorated trees were originally pagan symbols (http://www.fabulousfoods.com/holidays/xmas/treehistory.html) anyway. The Christians incorporated evergreen trees into their celebration. So, it seems more accurate to refer to them as holiday trees. However, one can refer to their own personal tree anyway they want. That's the joy of freedom! http://www.cosgan.de/images/smilie/verschiedene/a075.gif

[Parrothead]

You know, each year that I hear this controversy over the name of a tree, I am just amazed. People's sensitivities and the "pc"ness of the whole situation is laughable (IMO). If people are so adamant about calling the tree a "holiday" tree, why are the not equally concerned about the names of other religious symbols on display at the same time (I don't know about other cities, but here the display is a celebration of lights, festivities and respects the various religions celebrating their holy days during the time). Why not any concern about the public display of Menorahs at the same holiday displays, should they not be referred to as holiday "candalabras" so as not to offend people or make that religion stand out? We've had this arguement over the tree name so many times in the past number of years here in Toronto. Most people found the whole arguement silly. In arguing that it not be called a Christmas tree, due to one religion taking precedent over others, the question would be raised, isn't it just as disrespectful, singling out one religion against others by renaming the tree, but the names of symbols from others remain? This year the city website once again calls it a Christmas tree from the outrage voiced not only by Christians, but those that practice other faiths and those that don't practice any, over the name change to the tree in previous years.

[The Supreme Canuck]

Okay, I had a bit of a rant here, but I decided to edit it. All I want to say is that calling people "fundamentalists" may not be accurate nor is it constructive.

[Tinaa]

Maksutov:

You are just asking for trouble!

12. Politics & Religion

Due to the contentious nature of these subjects, forum participants are strongly advised to avoid discussing religious and political issues. Please don't begin or contribute to a topic that's merely going to incite or fuel a flame war.

However, the following exceptions apply:

A) Political impact upon space programs, exploration, and science.

B) Focused, polite discussion of concepts such as creationism and "intelligent design" which bear direct relevance to astronomy and science, for the purposes of conversing about and addressing misconceptions.

C) Focused, polite discussion of the difference between astronomy (including cosmology) and religion

Partisan political debate is unwelcome and should be undertaken elsewhere. The same applies to debates purely religious in nature. Likewise, proselytizing will not be allowed. In short, you are allowed to discuss politics and religion within a very limited scope where they affect space and space exploration, astronomy, and science. Nothing more. If you really really need to talk about these topics with someone, take it to email or to another bulletin board.