Lance's Bigfoot

[mugaliens]

I think Lance posted this in the CTRL-V section: http://www.bigfootencounters.com/files/mk_davis_pgf.gif

Sure looks real, but has anyone read anything about this movie? Anyone reveal the truth behind it on their deathbed since it was filmed?

[01101001]

Looks like the Patterson Bigfoot Hoax.

Wikipedia: Bigfoot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigfoot)

On October 20, 1967, Roger Patterson and Robert Gimlin captured a hairy, bipedal Bigfoot-type figure on film. There is much debate as to whether the creature in the Patterson-Gimlin film is genuine.
[...]
The Patterson-Gimlin film shows a creature that is definitely not a bear, and this film was for a long time considered the strongest evidence for Bigfoot. However, Wallace claimed to have been involved in hoaxing the film, and opinions remain divided as to the film's authenticity. Many experts have judged it as a hoax, Napier among them.

Wikipedia: Patterson-Gimlin film (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patterson-Gimlin_film)

[mugaliens]

Interesting!

[HenrikOlsen]

Skeletal proportions definitely looks closer to homo that to anything else. I'd say it's a guy in an ape suit.

[peteshimmon]

Incidentally I think a few missing posters
might be found slumped in front of their
pc's with Lances avatar going. Makes me jump:)

[Superluminal]

That's the digitally stabilized version of the Patterson film, which is very shaky. It looks even more like a man in a gorilla suit now.

[Lance]

And, contrary to the name of the thread, the link I posted in the Ctrl-V game was from a post originally made (http://www.illuminati-r-us.com/Forums/viewtopic.php?t=1551) by Superluminal.

[Gillianren]

You mean you don't have a big foot?

[Lance]

You mean you don't have a big foot?
Size 10, wide.

[mugaliens]

Well, that's not all that big.

Ok, so now we know you weren't the one in the gorilla suit!

[Gillianren]

Right. My boyfriend's got a size 14. Which is a real nuisance for finding shoes in, not unlike my size 10 women's foot.