|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello all,
I just bought a second hand Celestron 8" Star Hopper Dobsonian. It looks brand new, just one or two little hickies on the tube. Other than that it looks like the scope has sat unprotected, up-right in a back room for a long, long time collecting tons of dust. Needless to say the primary and everything else looks like a major league dust bunny with a fuzzy mask on. I've removed all gear from the tube, i.e. the primary with its mount, eyepiece mechanism along with the secondary mirror and have set aside. Used a rag on the inside and outside of the tube. What's a good cleaning procedure with the first surface mirrors? And too on the dobsonian mount, do the small teflon pads need anything like silicone or wax? Thanks for any tips or direction, Randy Austin, Texas <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: RMallon on 2002-11-05 20:09 ]</font> |
|
|||
|
Quote:
You can find instructions for cleaning mirrors in books like StarWare or Backyard Astronomer's Guide. First, I get some surgical cotton, distilled water, and a clean spritzer bottle. The technique is to first rinse the mirror with distilled water (spritz it down good, get the big chunks of dust off), then pour some distilled water (with no more than 1 drop of dishwashing liquid) on the mirror, and use the surgical cotton to lightly (apply no pressure, just let the weight of the cotton do the work) swirl from the center of the mirror out. Frequently turn and replace the cotton. Finally, rinse with distilled water. Rinse thoroughly. Any water remaining can be left to dry, or can be sopped up with a corner of the surgical cotton. I usually clean the mirror while it is still on the mount, but if you take the mirror off, a good idea would be to support the mirror in a sink with a lot of towels (to cushion it against any shock or accidently dropping it). Finally, as to lube for the Dob's alt and az bearings, don't apply anything unless it is needed. I have used a good silicone based car wax (like turtle wax) to good affect. Usually, teflon on ebony star formica makes a good motion with no "sticktion" and won't need any extra lubrication. |
|
|||
|
A quick google search brings up quite a few hits on mirror cleaning, such as this one:
http://members.aol.com/bemusabord/cleaning.html
__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere |
|
|||
|
Thanks for the write up and the link.
After cleaning the primary lense I held it up to a bright light to look thru the back side. Saw a few hundred pinholes of light coming thru the backside. Guess a bit of this is normal breakdown of mirror's reflective coating. Imagine after a length of time it'll be due for a fresh mirror coating. Brought out the scope last night for its 'first' light. Saturn was on a low rise in the east about 10pm. Nice viewing with the 24mm eyepiece that the scope came with. Wonder what other sizes I should buy? I do have a 4mm along with a Barlow lense with the old 6" Newtonian I have. The 4mm really ups the magnification but sure is a loss of sharpness. Get what you pay for I guess. Need to rig up my Coolpix 990 on it too and attempt some astro shots. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
As to eyepieces, it depends on how much money you have. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] As to loss of sharpness with the 4mm eyepiece, the seeing on any particular evening (or even minute by minute) as well as the quality of the optics limits the amount of magnification you can get without significant loss of sharpness. |
|
|||
|
Rigged up a crude eyepiece adaptor and tried a few shots with my digital camera this evening just about an hour ago.
Top one is with a bit of camera optical zoom and sharpening. Second and third is with a bit of Barlow power. Eyepiece is a Celestron 25mm. Sure beats the old binoculars. May try a shot or two of Saturn later on this evening. ![]() ![]() <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: RMallon on 2002-11-07 21:25 ]</font> |
|
|||
|
Excellent photography! Am considering same eventually after upgrading scope. Details on that camera and its settings please. Still gonna have to get one with a time exposure setting of some sort...those cheapo cameras at walgreen's won't hang open like needed.
Again, great work! Post those Saturn shots soon! |
|
|||
|
I used my Nikon Coolpix 990. It's a 3.3 megpixel.
The local camera store wanted 120 bucks for a little lense adaptor and a t-adaptor. Skipped on that expense for now and made my own for about 5 bucks. Used a plastic medicine bottle along with a bit of corrective surgery. Tried a few shots of Saturn. Posting will have to wait a day or two. Here's a run down of the settings for the above shots...... <center> <center><center> <center><center> <center> |
|
|||
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2719.2200" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY>Had fairly clear skies last night other than the usual Austin humidity hanging in the air. The wind was buffeting the telescope so it was difficult to get a steady shot of anything. I had driven out a bit to a new neigborhood addition, paved streets with no houses. Was pleasantly surprised to see another party of three stargazers present. I joined them for about an hour. They were using a 8" Schmidt Cassegrain with a lot of nice bells and whistles. ![]() After Jupiter began its climb after midnight, I "attempted" a few shots. As you can see I'm needing to invest in a better quality Barlow lens and other eyepieces. Of course the distance has a bit to do with it too, being apx,...483m miles away. The three little gray smudges are moons. Again, I removed the hot pixels and sharpened both photos a little. When on site it's hard to see digital photo playback results on the camera's dinky LCD viewing screen. May try connecting the camera with a USB cable to a laptop for onsite playback. (speed up that instant gratification [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] ![]() The Saturn photo faired a bit better here. 770m miles distant. Digital pixeling is a bit of a problem. When removing excess noise I may have removed some of the background exposure. <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: RMallon on 2002-11-09 09:57 ]</font> |