If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2006, 05:46 PM
larkspur's Avatar
larkspur larkspur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Default

Thanks for all the input. I am leaning towards the Scope Buggy.
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2006, 07:08 PM
Fr. Wayne's Avatar
Fr. Wayne Fr. Wayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oak Forest, IL
Posts: 1,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sci_tchr
I have a homemade 4" dobsonian.

fos....
But does it work? Good work nonetheless. Whatever fos... means.

Kaptain K: With all due respect, sir, if I may speak freely? (giggle.)Three may be too tipsy but equally workable and on the right track as far as saving money buying one less wheel. Good thinking. How about locking the two rear wheels and calling it a Larkspurwagon - LSW for short. Gotta have 4 to call it a wagon, besides buying 4 wheels in package deal may be more economic. (What a nut I am!)

Just saw last post. Nevermind.

Last edited by Fr. Wayne : 25-March-2006 at 07:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2006, 07:34 PM
larkspur's Avatar
larkspur larkspur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr. Wayne
But does it work? Good work nonetheless. Whatever fos... means.

Kaptain K: With all due respect, sir, if I may speak freely? (giggle.)Three may be too tipsy but equally workable and on the right track as far as saving money buying one less wheel. Good thinking. How about locking the two rear wheels and calling it a Larkspurwagon - LSW for short. Gotta have 4 to call it a wagon, besides buying 4 wheels in package deal may be more economic. (What a nut I am!)
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2006, 07:38 PM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr. Wayne
But does it work? Good work nonetheless. Whatever fos... means.

Kaptain K: With all due respect, sir, if I may speak freely? (giggle.)Three may be too tipsy but equally workable and on the right track as far as saving money buying one less wheel. Good thinking. How about locking the two rear wheels and calling it a Larkspurwagon - LSW for short. Gotta have 4 to call it a wagon, besides buying 4 wheels in package deal may be more economic. (What a nut I am!)
OK, I assumed 4 wheels. Three would be fine, but my main point is still valid. Do not use casters for all the wheels. I write from persomal experience. You will think that it has a (malevolent) mind of its own!
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2006, 11:25 PM
cjl's Avatar
cjl cjl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: University of Colorado - Boulder
Posts: 2,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by larkspur
The only draw back to this new scope is hefting it. It is much too heavy for one small to medium build person(man or woman) to carry outside. We are trying to find a way to attach it to a hand truck so it can be rolled out-with tripod attached- and set up by one female person (me). Got any ideas on the best way to manage this?
We haven't really tried much, but the best way we've found is simple - two 170lb guys to haul it around (me & my dad). I can see how it would be a bit of a problem to get around all by yourself - it's bulky and heavy, and although with 2 people it isn't bad, one would have a hard time.

The previously linked "scopebuggy" or "wheeley bars" sound like they would work pretty well for getting it around.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2006, 03:17 AM
Fr. Wayne's Avatar
Fr. Wayne Fr. Wayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oak Forest, IL
Posts: 1,293
Default

Here's an alternative. One big plywood base w/ rope attached to your John Deere riding mower? How's that for cheap?
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2006, 12:43 PM
larkspur's Avatar
larkspur larkspur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr. Wayne
Here's an alternative. One big plywood base w/ rope attached to your John Deere riding mower? How's that for cheap?
I don't know.........how much is a John Deere riding mower? could I hook the telescope wagon to my Poulan self propelled mulching mower?
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2006, 05:08 PM
Fr. Wayne's Avatar
Fr. Wayne Fr. Wayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oak Forest, IL
Posts: 1,293
Default

Only if it cost less than a John Deere. (giggle.)
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2006, 07:56 PM
Classic8 Classic8 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2
Default

Hi, newbie (to the board) here.

As my ID mentions, I have a Celestron C8. I like the versatility and ease of use, but I am thinking about getting another scope to get more crisp or contrasty views, possibly a good-sized refractor. Anybody have any experience or knowledge of Celestron or Meade 4-5" refractors? Probably don't have enough money for an APO.
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 27-March-2006, 05:48 AM
Fr. Wayne's Avatar
Fr. Wayne Fr. Wayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oak Forest, IL
Posts: 1,293
Default

Refractors are good for planets. Such scopes are priced by their primary objective lens' quality and their f/ratio. Search a lot of posts in this section which goes for many pages. You will find both scopes as titles somewhere. Light passing through glass lens changes its characteristics. Once light is altered it cannot be restored exactly as it was. To compare more modern designs would be worth it. WELCOME!
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2006, 12:17 PM
isis's Avatar
isis isis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 29
Default

Celestron N5i - no tripod, use it table mounted. The only eyepiece I use is a Vixen zoom.
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 29-March-2006, 11:50 PM
larkspur's Avatar
larkspur larkspur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Lightbulb Cheapest solution

I found a cheap and easy way to move the scope. While waiting on my man to come home, the skies are clear and getting darker by the moment. I need a way to get the scope outside. I remembered the Super Sliders that I have to move furniture to I thought I would give them a try on the scope. It worked beautifully! The scope slid right over the threshold and on to the concrete patio like it weighed only ten pounds!
I am almost sure the Super Sliders are cheaper than a John Deere

Here are some photos of the sliders and scope:

http://www.bautforum.com/attachment....1&d=1143679405
http://www.bautforum.com/attachment....1&d=1143679338
Attached Images
File Type: jpg superslider.jpg (34.9 KB, 26 views)
File Type: jpg LX200Rsliders.jpg (23.9 KB, 26 views)
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 04-April-2006, 04:49 PM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,615
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by larkspur
I found a cheap and easy way to move the scope. While waiting on my man to come home, the skies are clear and getting darker by the moment. I need a way to get the scope outside. I remembered the Super Sliders that I have to move furniture to I thought I would give them a try on the scope. It worked beautifully! The scope slid right over the threshold and on to the concrete patio like it weighed only ten pounds!
Sometimes, the low tech solutions are the best!

As W Edwards Deming used to say, "Gravity is cheap and reliable".
__________________
"I'm as accurate as any psychic. And I'm a cartoon!" -- Squidward

"Arrrgh, the laws of physics be a harsh mistress!" -- Bender
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 05-April-2006, 04:19 AM
cjl's Avatar
cjl cjl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: University of Colorado - Boulder
Posts: 2,102
Default

Very nice solution. Unfortunately, it wouldn't work for us, but it looks like it works great for you.

On another note, my dad just ordered a ToU cam, so we should have some planetary images soon from our scope

Hoping to get some good ones next month: there's a multi day launch in the middle of nowhere, and we're taking the scope and camping out. With luck, there'll be no clouds.
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 06-April-2006, 02:55 AM
naios's Avatar
naios naios is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Eastern Canada
Posts: 74
Default In a Week

In a week I make the exciting venture from 6" Dobs to 8" Dobs. Should be interesting...
Reply With Quote
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 06-April-2006, 12:57 PM
AstroSmurf's Avatar
AstroSmurf AstroSmurf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,030
Send a message via ICQ to AstroSmurf
Default

I have a home-built 8" f/5 Dob that I bought from a local scope-builder. I'm (slowly) grinding the mirror of what's going to be a 6-7" f/22 Schiefspiegler for planet viewing. Our local astronomy club is heavily into scope construction, so the only factory-built pieces I have are eyepieces and associated things.

My dad has a (I think) 5" refractor built from the objective of an aerial reconaissance camera, and he just finished work on his 14" mirror. We also have quite a few other bits and pieces - we "inherited" some things from the astronomy department of a university, but they all need substantial work to become useable. The largest piece is a 16" mirror that was used for spectroscopy, but since it's about 3" thick we're considering slicing it in half to reduce cooling times. We also have some diffraction gratings, so I'm thinking of building a spectroscope.
__________________
"We do not require reality to conform to the expectations of the ignorant"
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 14-April-2006, 02:11 PM
Fr. Wayne's Avatar
Fr. Wayne Fr. Wayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oak Forest, IL
Posts: 1,293
Default

Sounds like a treasure-trove. Does anyone out there carry a spectroscope which can easily attach to a SLR Camera or maybe a filter/lens which can discern spectral lines from light sources of > 0 magnitude? A handy field tool which could fit in a back pack would be very cool.
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 15-April-2006, 01:44 AM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: Which telescope have you got?

Two Newtonian reflectors from that once-popular company, Hand-Made Telescopes: a 4.25" RFT and an f/8 8". The primary mirrors for both were ground, polished, and figured by yours truly. The 4.25 is on an Edmund GEM with tripod. The 8" is on a fork equatorial of my own design.

Plus a pair of 7X50 Jason binoculars when it's time to just cruise through the heavens.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 15-April-2006, 09:39 AM
Arneb's Avatar
Arneb Arneb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 2,232
Default

Oh, no Maksutov-Cassegrain then? Should we call you RFT from now on?
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem.
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 15-April-2006, 04:44 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: Which telescope have you got?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arneb
Oh, no Maksutov-Cassegrain then? Should we call you RFT from now on?
That's fine by me.

Always wanted to get one of those scopes with a hole in the primary mirror, but things such as food and clothes for the family, mortgage payments, utilities, car loans, etc., always kept getting in the way.

Guess the BB handle could be considered wishful thinking. One of these days, though...and it has nothing to do with Alice.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
Reply With Quote
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 30-April-2008, 09:27 PM
dazastar dazastar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 16
Default Telescopes in my toy box

I'm a big fan of maks, but I still use my large Dob just as much. so here goes my list of favorites.

Synta Maksutov 150mm with 1900mm focal length - This ones a real hummer, every star party and astro meet people comment on how rich the contrast is on planetary vewing, not a sloucher on DS's either. A bit heavy to lug around though.

Skywatcher Mak 102mm 1300 focal length - This is one little champ to have as a grab and go, fantastic contrast and great dep sky viewing. I ended up ditching its EQ head, kept the tripod and used the ioptron goto cube head on the skywatcher mount. This made it very stable and usable as a cheap gps goto system.

GSO 10" dob with crayford and fan cooled mirror (www.andrewscom.com.au) - This thing kicks. Th