|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Here's an article regarding Meade's Deep-Sky Imager (seems to be reasonably prices and supposedly somewhat easy to use):
http://www.cloudynights.com/documents/ds1.pdf I own a Dobs so wouldn't be in the market for that sort of thing (more likely Celestron's Neximage).
__________________
Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils - Berlioz Orion 8" F 4.9 Newt on an LXD75 Go-to mount Telrad Televue Plossl 8mm/20mm UO Abbe Ortho Baader Hyperion 13mm/17mm/24mm Orion Q70 26mm Takahashi LE 5mm Vixen LVW 22mm Paracorr Orion SSDS Monochrome Imager II on the way! |
|
||||
|
the Canon 300D can produce super images ..here is a link to an "astrophotography cook book"...
http://www.saratogaskies.com/article...ook/index.html |
|
||||
|
I think the Canon 300/350 is a very good choice. I use the latter, and it is a beautiful camera with very low noise if you don't go over ASA 800. My astroshots haven't been wholly convincing but neither have my shots on film - I think it is because I am not a very good astrophotographer (yet?).
You will have to spend money on it, but the older 300D (at 6.3 MPixels) should have become considerably cheaper since the launch of the 350D (at 8.0). If you really want to spend money, Canon offers a EOS 20Da. A as in astrophotography. It removes the problem that most DSLRs are very insensitive to H alpha light because of their IR blocking filters. Some results I have seen are astonishing, but it will set you back by at least $ 1200. Here is an introduction I found with a cursory search.
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem. |