|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I've developed some of my Moon photos and still have some camera jitter. I use a 200 mm with a 2 x lens and the craters along ther terminator still look a bit blurry.
I used ASA 200 film. Am I better off with ASA 100? I stopped it down to f/8 like suggested and used between 1/60 sec and 1/1000 sec as suggested. I have a SLIK 5000 tripod. Cost about $ 50. If I just photograph in the tripod's smallest position (legs unextended), will this get rid of the jitter effect? Is the tripod more stable when it's down on the ground rather than legs extended and up higher? Or is the difference not noticable? |
|
|||
|
JustAFriend covered your question, but just for an explanation of why this is so, when the tripod's legs are unextended, its center of mass is lower than when the legs are extended. Thus, when the tripod is hit by wind, for example, there is a larger torque on the tripod and camera/scope with legs extended, as for a given amount of force applied to an object, torque increases as the lever arm increases (the tripod feet are the fulcrums).
As for film ISO's (ASA's), the lower the ISO, the less sensitive it is to light. A higher ISO will yield a shorter exposure than a lower ISO, if all other parameters are the same. However, IIRC, the higher the ISO, the grainier the film. I hope that helps. |
|
|||
|
Part of it is the tripod, and part is the 2x convertor. You didn't say what kind of lens you're using either. If it is a zoom, especially a slow zoom, you're only setting yourself up for disappointment.
Quite frankly, Slik tripods are pieces of crap, and 2x convertors will make even the best lens yield soft results under ideal circumstances. Slap a 2x convertor on a typical consumer zoom, then mount it on a cheap tripod and you get blurry photos every time. Even if you use a Canon 200/2.8L lens and Canon 2x convertor on a monster Bogen tripod you'll get soft photos.
__________________
"There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened." Douglas Adams |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Y Ellipse more stable orbit than Circle? | Rob513264 | Questions and Answers | 9 | 20-June-2007 09:18 AM |
| Can 10x50 binoculars be held steady without a tripod? | Tucson_Tim | Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories | 13 | 05-May-2007 02:07 AM |
| Zero G at the centre of the Earth? | Sticks | General Science | 107 | 14-February-2007 03:51 PM |
| Would moons of gas giants have stable axes of revolution? | Frog march | Questions and Answers | 1 | 06-September-2005 03:46 PM |
| Questions about tripod purchase? | offset | Astronomy | 11 | 19-August-2004 09:37 AM |