If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2008, 01:35 PM
chaboyax's Avatar
chaboyax chaboyax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14
Default maybe a silly question about eq mounts

hi i thinck i maybe asking a daft question here but when i read about setting up an eq mount everthing says to basicly line up the mount to the north and to have the pole star in the polar scope. when i do this with a compass the pole star is off to thenorth east so i can never get close to it being in the polar scope.have i got a dodgy compass or am i doing some thing wrong

i have a 6" 1200f scope on a eq3-2 mount
live on the east coast of uk
about 52deg longatude
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2008, 03:57 PM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,367
Default

There are very few places on Earth where "magnetic" north is the same as "true" north! If you have the pole star in the polar scope, it would be more correct to say that "magnetic" north is "off to the northwest". If Polaris is in the field of view of the polar finder, you are within 3/4 degree of "true" north!
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2008, 04:52 PM
RickJ RickJ is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 759
Default

If you are using the scope for only visual viewing or planetary photography with very short exposure time (a couple seconds at most) then there's no need to get at all picky about polar alignment. For many years I just rolled the scope out, eyeballed it to see if it was pointed north and it looked like the polar axis was pointed to the height of Polarirs. To do this I just stood a few feet south of the mount and looked at its general configuration. Whole process took 30 seconds. That was plenty good enough for keeping the object in the eyepiece at high power for as long as I ever needed, even with neighborhood star parties with all the neighbors dropping by for a look. For a moon photo taken with this approximate (within maybe 5 degrees) polar alignment see:
http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org/...johnson-02.jpg

For long exposure piggy back photography putting Polaris somewhere in the pole finder scope is sufficient. For long exposure deep sky photography then fine tune that with drift alignment after following the instructions for offsetting polaris in the finder scope.

Don't worry about the compass, its only to help you find Polaris in the scope in the first place. I have so much iron in the ground up here a compass can point south, west or any random direction. They are useless here. They were useless on my drive as well. It had rebar in the concrete. The compass was very confused and useless there too. You only give an aproximate location. If near Ipswitch the deviation is only about 1.5 degrees west. It sounds like you are seeing far more than that. If so you are being hit by local conditions, natural or manmade as I am.

You can look it up if interested at:
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomagmodel...alcDeclination
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2008, 05:15 PM
chaboyax's Avatar
chaboyax chaboyax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14
Default

thanks for the replies i think ive got this now ill give it ago tonight if the sky clears i live just a bit north of ipswich (lincolnshire) tho i go there at least once a month to see me mam. going to take the scope with me next time. not upto the point of photography yet (£££££££)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2008, 07:19 PM
laura-mae's Avatar
laura-mae laura-mae is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
Default

north is north der
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 27-March-2008, 03:21 PM
chaboyax's Avatar
chaboyax chaboyax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14
Default

stop stalking mr laura-mae i dont like you
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28-March-2008, 09:20 PM
laura-mae's Avatar
laura-mae laura-mae is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
Default

Ohhh i love you Charlie chalk x Your the bestest brother in da whole world...wack wack
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
this may be a silly question but... Rekisha Questions and Answers 9 13-March-2008 11:31 PM
Parallax question. Two actually... man on the moon Questions and Answers 19 17-November-2007 12:25 AM
The big "Why?" firstcontact General Science 83 27-September-2006 09:21 PM
Question on detailed images & smart way 2 view Apollo ? Manchurian Taikonaut Space Exploration 3 11-July-2004 02:02 PM
Question about Telescope mounts and other things skrap1r0n Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 15 21-March-2004 03:08 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today