|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
This isn't go-to. Dual axis drive gives you the ability to guide on both axes. This is done at very slow speed since the corrections are small. You still put the object in the field of view manually then use the slow motions to center it and to guide a long exposure.
Rick |
|
|||
|
For planetary photography you don't need to be all that close to the pole. I just eyeball it for that. Stand back and look to see if it is pointed to what I consider to be north. Set the elevation with a protractor and you're done.
The main use of the slow motions is to center the planet or moon on the field of view which is difficult to do manually at anything but low power. For deep sky work, when I was portable, I used the drift alignment (Google it) method. It is far more accurate than using Polaris. You need that added accuracy or you can get rotation of the field of view while guiding perfectly. I can't see polaris from my current observatory nor within 20 degrees of it except on the east side where I can get within 15 degrees of it. Those in the southern hemisphere have no "South Star" unless you go down to below 5th magnitude and that's farther off than Polaris. Rick |
|
||||
|
If it is ever behind a building, it is always behind a building.
Polaris is never more than 3/4o from the pole! It's called Polaris because it is the nearest bright star to the pole! The sky essentialy revolves around it
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day. T. Anderson |
|
||||
|
Ok Kap K
So what you are trying to say is, even If I can not see it with my eye, the scope will still slew to it? If that is the case, that is cool by me. I say that because I watched it on purpose tonight and it did go behind the building across the street Last edited by Starchild615 : 22-April-2008 at 08:02 AM. Reason: Added more text |
|
||||
|
Remember that Polaris is not the brightest star in the night sky! It is, in fact, fairly inconspicuous. The bowl of the big dipper points to it, and it is the end of the handle of the little dipper.
__________________
You can't really tell the difference between drunken rambling and sober blogging. |
|
||||
|
Thanks Siguy
Shame on me, because I actually went to a class at the Hayden Planetarium here in NYC and they did teach us exactly what you just said and I got the 2 stars mixed up. So I have been tracking the wrong star all along. Time for me to get my books out of the attic ![]() The skies here are terrible, there is so much light pollution coming from the city lights, when I look up with the naked eye, I can only see a handful of stars, lately for some reason, its been worse then ever. I have NYC on one side and Jersey City on the other, so I am surrounded by these blinding lights. The street light outside does not help, I feel like B B Gunning the bulb to oblivion ![]() Thanks for the help
__________________
“There's no denying the public's appetite for cosmic discovery.” ~ Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is the telphotonic drive woowoo? | Tom Mazanec | Astronomy | 4 | 28-March-2008 03:08 PM |
| Dual Axis Drive / Solar Filter | Starchild615 | Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories | 4 | 18-March-2008 04:57 PM |
| The Alcubierre/broeck Warp Drive | imported_Ziggy | Against the Mainstream | 31 | 24-September-2004 09:46 AM |
| earth orbit around sun | WolfKC | Astronomy | 12 | 28-May-2004 01:48 AM |
| idle moon math | Geo3gh | Astronomy | 550 | 06-September-2002 05:19 AM |