If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-April-2008, 04:05 AM
zeroooooooooooo zeroooooooooooo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Default Good telescope on a budget?

I know next to nothing about telescopes, and I would like to get my dad for his birthday, which is coming up soon.

What are your suggestions in the price range of ~$200-250? Pros and cons of different models would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-April-2008, 04:57 AM
parejkoj's Avatar
parejkoj parejkoj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: spacing out
Posts: 594
Default

For that budget, I always recommend either a good pair of binoculars (does he have some? if not, definitely go this route!), or the Edmund Scientific Astroscan. The astroscan is about the cheapest, not-crappy telescope there is. Whatever you do, don't buy a "department store telescope" that is sold by how much magnification it has. They are not worth it.

You might want to check out the Cloudy Nights reviews and forum as well. This question has been asked many times there, and there should be plenty of answers. Also, on the webpage that this blog is attached to, Bad Astronomy, there is a FAQ about buying a telescope that might help you.

But, as I said above, a good pair of binoculars (probably 7x35 or 8x50: that debate rages ever on...) are definitely the top choice, if he doesn't yet have any. They can be used for bird watching and other things, and are the quickest way to learn one's way around the sky, which is important before moving on to more expensive telescope.
__________________
"What do you care what other people think?" -- Richard Feynman
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Feynman, at the conclusion of his Challenger report
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-April-2008, 05:42 AM
Starchild615's Avatar
Starchild615 Starchild615 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York City ~ Light Pollution Heaven
Posts: 229
Send a message via AIM to Starchild615
Default

Hi Zerooooooo

Parej is right , binoculars do fair well for this.

When I started Astronomy I bought myself a Celestron 80MM Scope which I Picked up for 200.00, honestly, it served me well when I started out, I have since moved on to a much larger scope. But my other scope was great for a beginner.

Heres where you can find one
good luck, what a GREAT present your father will receive, I think you are very thougthful.

Also try the Celestron AstroMaster 114 EQ Reflector Telescope, this is on an Equatorial Mount and is on sale for 149.99
http://www.telescopes.com/telescopes...qreflector.cfm


http://www.telescopes.com/telescopes...ttelescope.cfm
__________________
“There's no denying the public's appetite for cosmic discovery.” ~ Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23-April-2008, 02:01 PM
Trantor Trantor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 352
Default

Yeah, I agree that binoculars would be the best choice to begin learning about the sky. Cloudy Nights is a good place for good binocular advice. For $200 to $250, you can get a pretty good pair these days. Check out the Oberwerk binoculars over at Bigbinoculars.com. Oberwerk has a variety of good quality binoculars at a fair price. I would not recommend that you start out with one of the giant binoculars, as these need a heavy duty tripod and have a smaller field of view compared to a mid sized pair. I think that a good quality 10x60 would be an excellent starting point, and they would be great for terrestrial viewing as well.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 23-April-2008, 05:50 PM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,615
Default

I see that Orion now has a 6 inch version of their Star Blast for $250.

A 6 inch scope is a nice size for finding Messier objects.
__________________
"I'm as accurate as any psychic. And I'm a cartoon!" -- Squidward

"Arrrgh, the laws of physics be a harsh mistress!" -- Bender
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 23-April-2008, 06:05 PM
Nick Theodorakis Nick Theodorakis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Default

My first scope was the Orion 4.5in Skyquest, and I was happy with it (still am, in fact, even though I also have a 10 in scope now).

Nick
__________________
Nick Theodorakis
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 24-April-2008, 02:15 AM
Starchild615's Avatar
Starchild615 Starchild615 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York City ~ Light Pollution Heaven
Posts: 229
Send a message via AIM to Starchild615
Default

I know Binocs is a good choice for this, but I think that he wants to give his dad a nice big box with a scope, I understand that, it would be exciting to watch someone open that, I would have loved a gift like that years ago
__________________
“There's no denying the public's appetite for cosmic discovery.” ~ Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 24-April-2008, 11:12 PM
Siguy's Avatar
Siguy Siguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 332
Default

Warning! Stay away from the Astromaster 114, the 130 and other models are okay, but the 114 has a fast spherical mirror at the heart of it. To "fix" it, there is a barlow built into the focuser which makes collimation tricky, doubles the focal length, and the scope overall retains about a wave of spherical aberration.

Here are some models in your price range:

Orion StarBlast Astro Telescope:
Very good starter scope. Simple to use, but you will need to have it on a sturdy table since it is meant for kids and thus very, very short. The eyepieces supplied are also rather low quality.

Note: Orion recently released the StarBlast 6, a six inch version. I do not recommend it as while they upscaled the tube, they failed to properly scale up its features and thus it is left with just a 1.25'' focuser, rather pointless mount, and crummy red dot finder. Decent qualities for a 4.5'', but not for a 6''.


Orion Starblast 4.5 EQ
:
Much better because it has a nice German Equatorial mount, excellent eyepieces, and can be adjusted to your height since it has a tripod. The German Equatorial mount is rather complicated for beginners, though.

Edmund Scientifics Astroscan: Nice starter scope, sturdy, easy to maintain, and it has been positively reviewed for more than 20 years. But I personally recommend modern starter scopes over it.


Orion Skyquest XT4.5
: Overall excellent starter scope, but it is rather low since it is made for kids.

Orion Skyquest XT6: Great starter scope in every way, but it is a bit out of your price range. Much better than the StarBlast 6.

Orion SpaceProbe 3 AZ: Cheapest scope regularly recommended. Decent enough for the money.

Zhumell 8'': This is a possibility that just came into my mind. It is 2'' more in aperture than the 6'' Orion for only a bit more.

The above scopes are those that are commonly recommended. But universally recommended is a decent pair of 10X50 binoculars, which should get you started. But eventually you will want a telescope; it is inevitable.

All of the above telescopes are reflector telescopes, because those are most often recommended. I found that in trying to think of all the scopes I recommend, I have created a detailed but incomplete list. There are many other kinds of telescopes, each with its own advantages and drawbacks meant for seeing different things.

I have really not gone into depth about what you should look for when buying a telescope. I sort of got carried away. First of all, aperture is what you compare telescopes by, not magnification. Magnification is determined by eyepieces and limited by aperture. Larger apertures give higher maximum magnifications, higher resolution, brighter images, and thus more objects seen. The limit to magnification on most telescopes is about 2x per millimeter, or 60x per inch depending on atmospheric current (seeing.)

There are three main types of telescopes: Refractor, reflector, and catadioptric. Refractors use only lenses, reflectors use mirrors, and cats use both. The most common varieties are achromatic refractors, apochromatic refractors, Newtonian reflectors, Schmidt Cassegrains, and Maksutov Cassegrains. Other designs exist, however.

I could go on forever. Listen, how about you tell us what you want to see, whether you plan on astrophotography, how much you are planning to spend on accessories, et cetera.


Edit: Oops, I just noticed you were getting this as a gift. Never mind the last things I said. Go with the Orion SkyQuest XT4.5 or XT6, or either of the starblast models. They are probably the best gifts.
__________________
You can't really tell the difference between drunken rambling and sober blogging.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 25-April-2008, 02:33 PM
Nick Theodorakis Nick Theodorakis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Siguy View Post
...


Orion Skyquest XT4.5
: Overall excellent starter scope, but it is rather low since it is made for kids.
....
I'll second the observation that it is low, but I put mine a sturdy low table (abut 2 ft high, and about 3 by 3 ft square) to bring it to an adult-usable height. The table then also doubles as a place to put stuff.

Nick
__________________
Nick Theodorakis
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-May-2008, 09:24 AM
dazastar dazastar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 16
Default

If your going to go for a scope, get the one your going to use. I can't count the number of times I've witnessed people buying complicated set ups on equatorial mounts. My advice would be to get a good dobsonian. They are very easy to set up. Dobs are a great point and look scope with big appertures, bang for buck there the best.

You can get a 6" for around $250 dollers and can later be converted to mount on an EQ when your ready.

www.andrewscom.com.au have some really nice GSO scopes around the price range said above and come with a set of plossyl eyepieces and bonoculars.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2008, 06:58 PM
france113's Avatar
france113 france113 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: France, Usa
Posts: 86
Send a message via AIM to france113 Send a message via MSN to france113
Default

now the Orion StarBlast 6 is for $150!!!!!! SALE
http://www.telescope.com/control/pro...oduct_id=09964
__________________
B13
www.rapfrancais.tk
My Fast

VW GTI FAN!!!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-July-2008, 07:55 AM
CollinofAlabama CollinofAlabama is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 4
Default

Zero,

Get this scope here ...

http://www.telescope.com/control/pro...oduct_id=24688

... or one like it. An 80mm refractor on a reasonable mount is like a pair of binoculars on ultra-steroids. This scope would get him started without side-tracking him with collimation fiddling. These guys all are recommending reflectors, but if you're father is new to astronomy and just wants to get his feet wet, you should get him a refractor. Given your budget, this one is only slightly more than you specify, while still being a respectable performer. It's very easy to use and light weight and requires little to no maintenance. If he's a tinkerer and likes to diddle with things, one of the reflectors mentioned are good choices (avoid spherical mirrors, though).

Just the same, if he is not a tinkerer and just wants to do astronomy, the refractor is the way to go. Besides, they look cooler and are more impressive as a gift.

Good luck,

CDS
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-July-2008, 02:40 PM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,615
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CollinofAlabama View Post
Zero,
Might not see your message. The OP posted once a couple of months ago, and never posted again.
__________________
"I'm as accurate as any psychic. And I'm a cartoon!" -- Squidward

"Arrrgh, the laws of physics be a harsh mistress!" -- Bender
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-July-2008, 05:21 PM
redshifter's Avatar
redshifter redshifter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wa state - Seattle area
Posts: 623
Default

The Orion XT6 is now $230: http://www.telescope.com/control/cat...1/~VIEW_SIZE=9

An 'astronomical' bargain. With a 6" dob, you get enough aperature to see all the Messier objects + a lot more (and in some detail in the brighter objects), as well as a very stable dobsonian mount - no issues with stability here. Also, a dob is very easy to set up and use. IMO hands down the best all around beginner scope out there.

So:

Pros:
LOTS of aperature for the $
VERY stable dobsonian mount - this is every bit as important as optics, maybe even more so
EASY to set up - no worries about polar alignment, etc.
EASY to use - no knobs to fiddle with, simply nudge the scope with your hand to track objects - it is not difficult at all

Cons:
Little or no potential for astrophotography - dunno if this is really a con, it's not recommended for newbies to get into astrophotography right away anyways due to the very steep learning curve and need for specialized equipment
No auto tracking - A dob is strictly a manual tracking mount - though I've had no problems with this
Difficult to track objects at higher magnifications - Again, not really an issue, as the magnifications I've had trouble with are very rare, since the atmosphere will limit you to 150X or so maximum on the majority of nights anyways.

For further info, this is an absolute must read: http://scopereviews.com/begin.html

Here is a pertinent excerpt (though you should read the whole page):

This is a tough one to answer, since everyone has their own priorities and
preferences. Still, knowing what I know, if I were starting out today, I
would probably get a 6" or 8" Dobsonian-mounted reflector. The fact that
I am something of a "refractor guy" says a lot about this choice.

A 6" Dobsonian is simple, cheap, and will teach you a lot. The simplicity part
is important, since you will spend your time aiming and observing with your
telescope, rather than playing around with the sometimes complicated controls
on an equatorial mount.

Beginners need early success, and the 6" or 8" aperture is big enough to throw
up a bright image of most common celestial objects

EDIT: D'oh! Just realized how old this thread is...
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-July-2008, 11:25 PM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,367
Default

Old or not, it is still relevant to any newcomer!
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbie alert! Scope advice MOONDUST FRST Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 8 10-August-2007 01:14 AM
Good Telescope Retailer in Cincinnati Area andyschlei Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 6 31-May-2007 03:56 PM
Help needed with gift suggestion ildi Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 7 22-November-2003 08:31 AM
Apollo 13 Hoax? SAMU Conspiracy Theories 209 24-November-2001 04:04 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today