Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 27-June-2008, 06:45 AM
Reesa Reesa is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 8
Default finding focal length of primary

First of all...Hello to everyone. I just found this forum and I'm sorry to ask for help in my first thread.

I'm making a telescope and I found a mirror set at a local astronomy shop. He gave me an awesome deal, and my only problem is that I don't know the f/ratio of the mirror, so I can't figure out the focal length. He said it was easy to find and gave me a quick explanation, but I have to admit I was lost. Anyway, can anyone tell me how to find the f/ratio or the focal length? Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 27-June-2008, 12:48 PM
Hornblower Hornblower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA (near Washington, DC)
Posts: 1,090
Default

I would set up a small, unfrosted light bulb and a piece of paper side by side. A flashlight should do nicely. Turn the mirror toward the light and aim the reflection of the filament toward the paper. Move back and forth until the image comes to a sharp focus and measure the distance between the mirror and the paper. That will be your radius of curvature, and the focal length will be half of that.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2008, 05:20 AM
ctcoker ctcoker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: A short drive from Orion
Posts: 64
Default

Hornblower's suggestion is great for finding the focal length; the f/ratio will just be the mirror's focal length divided by its diameter.

EDIT: Wait, Hornblower, why will drawing out the image to a sharp focus cause it to be at the radius of curvature? Shouldn't it be at the focal point, and thus the distance between the paper and mirror be the focal length?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2008, 05:54 AM
Reesa Reesa is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 8
Default

Thank you Hornblower and ctcoker. I really appreciate you help. I was able to find the focal length and therefore the f/ratio . I'm not sure why the dividing by 2, either, but it worked great and I now know that I have a 6" f/8 mirror . Thank you again!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 28-June-2008, 07:13 AM
RickJ RickJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 844
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctcoker View Post
Hornblower's suggestion is great for finding the focal length; the f/ratio will just be the mirror's focal length divided by its diameter.

EDIT: Wait, Hornblower, why will drawing out the image to a sharp focus cause it to be at the radius of curvature? Shouldn't it be at the focal point, and thus the distance between the paper and mirror be the focal length?
Hornblower is very correct. Focal length is defined as the distance to the image plane for an object at infinity. Note that whenever you focus on an object closer than that, the focal point moves back. When the object is at the same distance as the focal plane that is the radius of curvature of the mirror and is where many optical tests are run. It is exactly twice the infinity focal length.

For a sphere a line drawn from the center to the surface will always hit the surface exactly perpendicular to the surface. Thus a light beam is then reflected perfectly back to the center forming a precise point at the center which is, of course also at the radius, hence the term "radius of curvature". Note this is a perfect focus, no spherical aberration at all.

When the rays hit the surface of the sphere coming in parallel to each other (infinity) then the surface is at an angle to the incoming rays and focuses at only half the distance they do when the rays come from the center of the sphere. Draw it on paper and the difference becomes obvious.

More than one novice mirror grinder has missed this point and ended up with a f/3 mirror rather than f/6 as intended.

Rick
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Starting out in astrophotography transparent_opacity Astrophotography 2 07-November-2007 08:32 PM
Strange emails from NASA Fraser Off-Topic Babbling 22 25-July-2007 02:45 PM
Limitations when imaging the planets afocally Bokmakierie Astrophotography 4 16-June-2007 03:27 PM
Relativity length contraction question ngeo Questions and Answers 19 07-June-2006 03:44 PM
Telescope Selection Help, Please! ob1dob Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 5 23-December-2005 05:55 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today