Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 31-July-2009, 06:33 PM
Music Junkie Music Junkie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 25
Default Collimation Question

O.K. I have probably worn out my welcome on this topic, but it is killing me..........

I have a Meade Lightbridge 8" Dob mounted Newtonian Reflector. I purchased a collimation tool to help out, but so far the instructions that came with the scope and with the collimation tool leave me bewildered! I have looked over the collimation info from several links posted on various sites (some helpful, some not so much).

1. In the center of the primary mirror there is what seems to be a sticker or marking that looks like a small white circle with a hole in the middle.
2. The instructions that came with the telescope say that due to the "fast" focal length (their words, not mine) the sweet spot for alignment is offset by 1/8" in two directions rather than centering perfectly. Say What??????
3. The collimation tool fits nicely into my focus drawtube with the eyepiece removed. When viewing through the collimation tool, the cross hairs DO NOT hit the center of the little white spot on the primary mirror. Should they? Or, does this offset that the telescope manual talks about come into play. I would think that they would offset the spot so you could align the optical system correctly, but who knows.

Anyway, if anyone is familiar with this scope and knows how this should be done, I would ABSOLUTELY LOVE some helpful input.

Thanks, as always, to eveyone here for their patience and understanding.

Frustrated.......................

MJ
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 31-July-2009, 06:44 PM
redshifter's Avatar
redshifter redshifter is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wa state - Seattle area
Posts: 1,011
Default

You should have the secondary mirror exactly centered under the focuser, and you should adjust it so that you can see the entire primary mirror reflected in the secondary. It seems like you then should be able to adjust the primary until the collimating eyepiece's crosshairs line up.

However, I don't understand the concept of offsetting at all. I've heard of it before, but I do not understand it; and I have no idea how it affects collimation. My previous instructions could be in error because of this offset.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 31-July-2009, 07:12 PM
Music Junkie Music Junkie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 25
Default

Yeah, the offset thing threw me as well. I would think that if they took the time to place a spot on the primary mirror, that it would have the offset compensated for. I am going to try the customer service at Meade and ask that very question. If it is compensated for and all I need to do is line up the cross hairs with the spot on the primary mirror, that would simplify things. I just want to make sure i don't change anything and do it wrong/make it worse........

MJ
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 31-July-2009, 07:28 PM
Music Junkie Music Junkie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 25
Default

Well, I just got off of the phone with Meade and they said the spot on the primary mirror does compensate for the offsets! Yeah! So, in theory, all I should have to do is just place the collimation tool in the drawtube and then line up the cross hairs with the center of the spot on the primary mirror. We shall see.

He did mention focusing on something in the day time and then getting it slightly out of focus. Then, once it is out of focus, refocus the object by adjusting the mirrors. That sounds a lot more cumbersome than just using the collimation tool though.

Man, I need a drink......

MJ
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-August-2009, 01:44 AM
RickJ's Avatar
RickJ RickJ is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 1,628
Default

The offset is necessary to keep the secondary as small as possible. Without it you would need a larger secondary to catch the bottom of the light cone. This is because the lower part of the secondary intercepts the light cone when it is wider than when the top of the secondary sees it. Thus you'd need move the secondary away from the eyepiece and down the tube that 1/8th of an inch. This moves it along the same plane it is already in, see diagram at link below. This has been done for you. At slower f ratios the difference is small and hardly matters so is usually ignored except by the fanatics. Still the dot on the primary will center on the cross hairs when you are correctly aligned. In fact moving the secondary has no effect on this as long as its tilt isn't changed. Moving it just puts the reflection of the main mirror into the center of the secondary where it belongs.

See:
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/howto/diy/3306996.html
for a good explanation.

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2009, 05:19 AM
redshifter's Avatar
redshifter redshifter is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wa state - Seattle area
Posts: 1,011
Default

Thank you Rick! That explains it well for me. It sounds like as long as the primary mirror reflection is centered on the secondary when viewed through a sight tube in the focuser, the offset is dialed in. I base that on this paragraph from the link:

If you use a sight tube to center the secondary as described in Step 1, you have automatically offset the secondary toward the primary mirror, thus ensuring that the fully illuminated field is centered. (When using the sight tube, you make the near and far edges of the secondary appear to have the same angular size. This means that the distance from the far edge of the secondary to the optical axis is greater than from the near edge to the axis. This constitutes an offset.) Both partial and full offset conditions give good collimation.

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2009, 07:16 AM
RickJ's Avatar
RickJ RickJ is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 1,628
Default

Yep, it all happens automatically.

Rick
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parallax question. Two actually... man on the moon Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers 19 17-November-2007 01:25 AM
Creationism and a "rate of star formation" question Robert Carnegie Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers 32 29-September-2007 11:34 PM
Test your intelligence Titana Off-Topic Babbling 184 20-January-2007 09:23 PM
Apollo tracking stations - very specific amplifier question Nicolas Space Exploration 17 20-March-2006 09:28 PM
A question for Arthur C Clarke The Watcher Astronomy 9 27-February-2004 01:34 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today