Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2009, 04:26 AM
nunciusaustralis nunciusaustralis is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Posts: 2
Smile Finderscopes-Real stuff.

I just bought a new 9x50 finderscope to use with my scope. I used to guide it only with a one of those L.E.D finders . I get shocked how easier is to find yourself with the the real finder scope. I cant imagine how is possible for serious observation use only that dot finder. I want to know the preference of other members about finders.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2009, 04:56 AM
Kyle Edwards Kyle Edwards is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 320
Default

For anything serious I also prefer a 50mm finderscope. Illuminated Reticle is a big plus. But for small telescopes the red dots seem to be perfect.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2009, 06:23 AM
RickJ's Avatar
RickJ RickJ is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mantrap Lake, MN
Posts: 1,630
Default

Only finder I have mounted on my 14" LX200R is a Telrad. My 10" f/5 has both an 8x50 and Telrad. 99% of the time I prefer the Telrad. While a unity finder like the red dot finders it uses a reticle of known diameters. After using it for a bit I literally see that reticle when looking at the star chart and thus can easily position it among the stars to find even 14th magnitude galaxies I'd never be able to see in a finder. The finder's restricted FOV makes this type of "finding" impossible. I grew up on regular finders having started in this hobby back in 1953 when I started construction of my first scope. But when the Telrad came out I quickly became a convert. Now I only use the 8x50 when I forget the binoculars and want a binocular type view of something. I just don't use it as a finder.

I hate red dot finders however. I need that reticle, not just a dot.

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2009, 07:27 AM
Tog_'s Avatar
Tog_ Tog_ is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 3,737
Default

My 16" Dob uses a 50mm finder and a Telrad. The vast majority of the time, I use only the Telrad. I only use the finder if the thing I'm looking for has no good, visible guide stars around it.

My star charts came with a little clear plastic thing that has the Telrad rings printed on it, to scale. The software I use can be set to any number of different finder configurations, one of the standards is a Telrad.

On my ETX (first generation) I removed the finder and replaced it with a Telrad-like finder. No dot, but a set pair of concentric circles. The finder on the first generation ETX was basically useless when mounted on the scope.

The only scope I don't use a Telrad for is a Goto LX90. I use the finder on that one to set it up and after that, I just use the keypad to tell it what I want to see.
__________________
I'm not evil.
An evil person would do the things I think up.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2009, 07:58 AM
toneri toneri is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
Default

Great info! Really informative. It is helpful for me.
__________________
La caisse epargne fr | Caisse epargne caisse d'epargne | www caisse epargne
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2009, 01:52 PM
Nick Theodorakis Nick Theodorakis is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,011
Default

When my Dob is pointed near azimuth, it makes we wish I had a right-angle finder; my straight-through finder is very hard on the neck looking up.

Nick
__________________
--
Nick Theodorakis
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2009, 09:08 PM
NickW's Avatar
NickW NickW is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bandon, OR
Posts: 764
Default

That reminds me, I need to order a new bracket for my finder scope. It broke is is being held by a piece of small rope. Makes for a real pain when it comes to aligning it with the main scope.
__________________
Defining science can be difficult. It’s a method, a way of looking at things. It’s a compendium of facts, knowledge, data. It’s a tool, used to investigate the world and to make sure we don’t let our biases, egos, and wishes get in the way of finding what’s real. Science (and skepticism) boil off the dross and leave the pure nugget of reality. ~Phil Plait
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 28-October-2009, 04:11 PM
redshifter's Avatar
redshifter redshifter is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wa state - Seattle area
Posts: 1,011
Default

I haven't used a finder scope in years. I removed the finderscope when I first got my XT 10 in 2003 and installed a Telrad. I'm definitely a Telrad convert. I did try a 'red-dot' finder from Orion, but it was practically useless because you couldn't see anything through it except the red dot.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 29-October-2009, 11:22 PM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,070
Default

On my 10 inch Dob I have both a 60mm finder and a Telrad. Like others, I use the Telrad almost exclusively.

I find the Telrad gets me where I need to be, and I can then star hop using a wide field lens in the main scope easier than using the finder.
__________________
"I'm as accurate as any psychic. And I'm a cartoon!" -- Squidward

"Arrrgh, the laws of physics be a harsh mistress!" -- Bender
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 30-October-2009, 09:09 PM
teddyv's Avatar
teddyv teddyv is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New West, BC
Posts: 601
Default

It goes to show how out of it I am since I had to go look up what a Telrad is. Looks very useful. Anyway, when I actually get a chance to use my scope I'm still using a 50mm finderscope on my 4" Newtonian. I think it's a bit heavy for it, but it works well enough for me.
__________________
Earth First! We'll mine the rest later.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 31-October-2009, 02:00 AM
Siguy's Avatar
Siguy Siguy is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 685
Default

I use a Stellarvue SV50 spotting scope, which is identical to their 50mm finder scope, as my finder. I'm going to add an illuminated reticule as well. It has very, very good optics, I highly recommend.
__________________
You can't really tell the difference between drunken rambling and sober blogging.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Dark Matter for real? Richard L. Astronomy 118 30-October-2009 03:29 AM
Uncertainty Principlel and Time sabianq Against the Mainstream 11 19-July-2008 03:58 AM
The REAL Neal Armstrong Conspiracy...? man on the moon Off-Topic Babbling 1 06-November-2007 02:25 PM
Anyone else do silly (that is, illogical) stuff? snarkophilus Off-Topic Babbling 73 14-February-2006 07:47 AM
reply to locked topic: real science discovers life on Mars MAP Life in Space 46 16-February-2004 11:24 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today