If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Astronomy Cast
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2006, 02:51 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 10,742
Post More Evidence for the Big Bang

Last week's episode started out with a bang... a Big Bang. This week we continue our discussion into the beginning of everything. We present three additional lines of evidence that have led astronomers to the conclusion that our Universe started out as a singularity 13.7 billion years ago, and has been expanding ever since. ...

Read the full blog entry
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2006, 03:08 PM
Frog march's Avatar
Frog march Frog march is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 3,654
Default

singularity, shmingularity.....
__________________
Click HERE, to waste some time.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16-October-2006, 07:56 PM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default

Hum,
about time too.
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 17-October-2006, 01:11 PM
Les_m_h Les_m_h is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1
Default

I'm sorry, but this question is bugging me. "If space is infinite, and it expanded from a singularity, then at what point did it become infinite? Was the singularity infinite?"
If this is a daft question, then it probably shows I don't really understand the Big Bang.
I love the show - can't wait for the journey home tonight so that I can listen to the latest episode in the car. "Pamela Gay for President of The Universe", I say!
__________________
Les
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 21-October-2006, 03:26 AM
jim.blanchard jim.blanchard is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1
Default Questions on the Big Bang Podcasts

Ok, so I've been listening with enormous interest to the Big Bang episodes and I have two questions. First, the CMB and it's variations. What is the best way to visualize the nature of the variations in the CMB? In my head, I'm seeing it as a sort of topological map of energy levels where some areas in the volume of the universe have higher levels then others. Measuring our own local energy level seems easy enough. How do we 'see' into other volumes? Is a thermodynamic/fluid model totally wrong?

Second, on the matter of measuring deuterium in stars and comparing them to the expected values from the Big Bang. If stars rapidly consume deuterium and covert it to helium, how is there any deuterium in a star to measure?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 25-October-2006, 11:57 PM
bethkatz17582 bethkatz17582 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 14
Default

I really liked this episode because you used good examples and ways of thinking about the Big Bang. I especially liked the visualization of time and distance by pushing the reset button and considering how long it would take for us to see light from various objects. I knew that already, but the example made it more concrete. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 20-November-2006, 05:20 PM
suitti suitti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 121
Default

We hear talk of the Visible part of the Universe. Past that, the expansion of the Universe moves objects (with respect to us) faster than light - so that objects farther than that are red shifted to nothing. What is the minimum size that the entire Universe must be? Will the CMB eventually be red shifted past the edge of the Visible Universe? If so, when?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 25-November-2006, 11:42 PM
sbharrat sbharrat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2
Default

The notion that we can't actually "see" to the other end of
universe because not enough time has elapsed was recently
raised. I can't quite get a handle on this. Does this mean
that during the (inflationary) period the universe would have
been expanding at faster than the speed of light? If no, can
you explain why the light from the other side wouldn't have
already reached us. If yes, what "loophole" allows this without
violating special relativity?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today