If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Astronomy Cast
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 24-December-2006, 04:19 AM
Apophis's Avatar
Apophis Apophis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 7
Default Black Holes/Quasars

A show on either one of these would be great.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 28-December-2006, 05:46 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 10,743
Default

Show number 18 is going to be about black holes.
__________________
Fraser Cain
Publisher
Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-January-2007, 08:25 AM
luckynate's Avatar
luckynate luckynate is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 26
Default

ok on black holes.....
If gravity truly moves at speed c (speed of light), how does it escape the black hole's event horizon to reach a distant observer (or in the case of cygnus x1, its binary partner), when everything else that moves at c or lower is dragged back? is there an exclusion principle inherent to the gravitational radiation that prevents the black hole from collapsing completely to a point? (ie the white dwarf or neutron stars held up against gravity by the various particle's exclusion principle?)
i dont even know if that makes sense because how could gravity attract itself, however the limiting speed c is non negotiable, soo....... i gotta know
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-January-2007, 08:49 AM
luckynate's Avatar
luckynate luckynate is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 26
Default

also, is the red shift that is observed as a star collapses to a point caused by the light being "dragged back" or is the relative recession of the matter inside,away from the event horizon(towards the singularity), the actual culprit?
(i mean that from the perspective of the outside observer, the space inside the event horizon recedes at an ever increasing rate approaching speed c, which would seemingly cause an apparent redshift in the light. If there is not a limit to the wavelength, this redshifted light would eventually approach an infinite wavelength, causing the escaping photons to move on or close to a straight line instead of a well defined wavelength). is there any reason this is impossible?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-January-2007, 11:19 AM
luckynate's Avatar
luckynate luckynate is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 26
Default

wowie, those claims that I made seem stupid to me now
__________________
------------------------------------------------------ I don't know about star clusters, Little Debbie, but I sure like your star crunch!
LuckyNate
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My theory: Black holes, white holes, scooley01 Against the Mainstream 6 15-September-2004 04:00 PM
Pravda: Black to Swallow Planet Earth Bozola Against the Mainstream 14 05-December-2002 04:35 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today