|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
You have probably all heard of the discovery of a fifth planet around 55CancriA:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2007-128 What confuses me: How is it possible that 3 (three!!) planets of that size (similar in size to Jupiter, Saturn and Neptune, respectively) all orbit that star much closer than Mercury does in our system? ![]() ![]() Shouldn't they interfere with each others' orbits, making them highly unstable? |
|
|||
|
Is it possible that we are only seeing a snapshot of a very transient phase in this particular system? Perhaps within a few thousand years the instability of this arrangement will become apparent with, say, two of the planets colliding, or one being absorbed by the star?
Another possibility is that as we look around the universe we find arrangements that throw our notions of sytem 'normality' out the window. For example, perhaps these planets have a synchronised or 'locked' orbit similar to the inner moons of Jupiter.... Questions I would also ask: - what's the mass of the star? If it's small, perhaps the collected mass of the planets works in some sort of binary way, with the centre of gravity lying between the star and the inner planet, or on the outside edge of the star? - and, finally, if it really is a highly unstable arrangement, are we 99% sure the data is being interpreted correctly? This is all just idle speculation, but it's fun eh...! With a bit of luck a professional astronomer (perhaps one from this show) will provide an answer now... :-) |
|
||||
|
Considering that in some of the multiple-planet systems the planets' mutual gravitational influence has been detected, not to mention several of them had been seen transiting the face of their star, I am willing to take on your bet.
__________________
Fiction has to be plausible. Reality is under no such constraint. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How Many Star Systems Might Contain Inhabited Planets? | filrabat | Astronomy | 47 | 25-December-2007 12:46 AM |
| 1 Year Without Pluto - & 12 reasons to reinstate it! | Mungascr | Astronomy | 56 | 02-September-2007 07:09 PM |
| Prospective planets in the solar system who are enrich with minerals? | suntrack2 | Questions and Answers | 5 | 24-September-2006 06:21 PM |
| There is no Nibiru | Zap | Against the Mainstream | 172 | 26-February-2003 02:57 AM |