If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Astronomy Cast
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 03:23 PM
sohh_fly sohh_fly is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: toronto canada
Posts: 2
Send a message via MSN to sohh_fly
Default is it possible ?

i have seen pictures where there are or it seems that there are stars outside the galaxy off by themselves.now if my eyes are not deceiving me how is that they are by themselves and is it possible for stars to be born off in the distance all alone. if so how would that be,what kind of actions would cause this and will they always be by themselves or do they gravitate towards the closest galaxies near by. need some understanding as this question was posed to me . thanks - have a nice day
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 04:55 PM
damian1727 damian1727 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 112
Default

as far as i am aware you cant see any stars that our not in our galaxy with the naked eye

stars can be flung out of their parent galaxy

but that is not what you are seeing

im sure you will get a better answer soon bit rushed at present..


xxx

:P
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 05:20 PM
schlaugh's Avatar
schlaugh schlaugh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Near 34 00 n / 084 00 w
Posts: 273
Default Perspective

Maybe you're seeing photos in which the camera/scope was aimed at a galaxy but nearby stars (relatively speaking) were captured in the image frame. See this picture of M31 for example:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ima...M31_hallas.jpg

Any individual star in that image lies within the Milky Way and between the camera and M31. An individual star sitting about 1 million light years away (roughly half the distance to M31) would be difficult to resolve in an image although maybe not impossible; Edwin Hubble was able to resolve Cepheid variable stars within M31, which helped him to calculate the distance between the Milky Way and M31. Still there are darn few stars in that big void between us and M31.

As damian1727 said, stars can be flung from a galaxy, such as when two galaxies collide.

For fun, google the phrase "star formation between galaxies".
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 09:29 PM
dcl dcl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 160
Default

Any stars appearing in photographs showing external galaxies but appearing to not be in those galaxies are almost certainly inside our own galaxy. However, some of them could conceivably have been flung outside our galaxy through gravitational interaction with other stars in our galaxy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today