Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Universe Today > Astronomy Cast
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-November-2008, 07:00 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 12,937
Default Ep. 113: The Moon, Part 2 - Exploration of the Moon

Let's continue on our journey to the Moon. Last week we talked about the physical characteristics of the Moon, its appearance in the sky and how it interacts with the Earth. This week we're going to take a look at how scientists have expanded our understanding of the Moon. From ancient astronomers using nothing more than their eyes and the first telescope observations of Galileo to the exploration by robotic spacecraft. And of course, the first tentative steps by the human explorers of the Apollo program.

More...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 13-November-2008, 03:34 AM
stu stu is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 369
Send a message via AIM to stu
Default

Wanted to point out an error in this episode, just after 19 minutes into the program, Pamela states that cratering rates are fairly constant throughout the solar system.

This is actually not true, and it's a major source of uncertainty when trying to create crater isochrons for dating surfaces on other rocky bodies. For example, the flux of impactors (number per unit area per unit time) on Mars is estimated to be approximately twice the flux of craters on the moon (see, for example, Ivanov, 2001, "Mars/Moon Cratering Rate Ratio Estimates" as well as Hartmann's latest Mars isochron paper from 2005).

This is also at least partially why, for at least a decade or so, the error bars on Venus' surface age from crater counts were a factor of two (between 500 and 1000 Myr).

The inner solar system is easier to extrapolate than the outer solar system, where we have reasons to believe that comets are a more significant impactor population than in the inner solar system. When I've talked with people about extrapolating isochrons to the outer solar system, they generally throw up their hands and say that it's still hard to get a good estimate when going to Mars.

Oh, and this happened to be the subject of my M.S. conditions last year, which is why I'm particularly attuned to it.
__________________

"Why do something now when you can put it off 'til later?" -- me :)

Last edited by stu; 13-November-2008 at 06:19 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moon Landing Conspiracy sk8rpinoi32 Conspiracy Theories 780 18-June-2009 03:34 AM
Moon missions - 3 stage approach heusdens Space Exploration 8 19-February-2007 07:03 AM
Moon is nothing but a detached part of earth? suntrack2 Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers 18 17-December-2006 04:53 AM
September 2006 AstroCalendar Dave Mitsky Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 0 08-September-2006 10:46 AM
The Sun and Moon ramsquire Astronomy 13 02-September-2005 06:31 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today