|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
NASA schedules news briefing about unusual solar object
Michael Brown, the scientist mentioned in the press release, is the co-discoverer of Quaoar and the recent 2004 DW. It's not clear if this is about the latter or something new, but I suppose we'll find out on Monday.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
||||
|
On very little evidence, I suspect that a large object and perhaps a companion have been found, further out than Pluto but otherwise similar.
__________________
Orion's Arm . The Starlark . Voices: Future Tense- Novella Contest Issue! . OA Flickr set |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Do NASA normally have press conferences to announce discoveries of large KBO's ? - This one must be pretty special then, or maybe its because its a discovery made with the new Spitzer Observatory?
|
|
||||
|
Spitzer is sensitive to infrared, and that's the best place to look for these distant objects. The fact that it's the most distant seen is good enough for a press conference.
I don't think it's bigger than Pluto, or, at least, that they think it might be bigger. If so, they wouldn't have announced the press conference that way. They would have been more vague. So I'm pretty sure it's what they say: the most distant object. If it were something they thought might be bigger than Pluto, then I'd expect Hubble to be used to try to resolve it. I didn't see anything in the archive that looked like that might be it. |
|
|||
|
What strikes me as possibly curious is the choice of terms such as "mysterious object" and "Unusual Solar Object" in the title. One might infer there-from that this means the object has unique properties, perhaps other than being "the most distant object ever detected orbiting the sun." There are, for example, a number of icy planetesimals in the Kuiper belt beyond Pluto, some of which, due to highly eccentric orbits, have aphelions in excess of 1000 AU.
|
|
||||
|
To interested parties here's a link to an interesting post to the MPML:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mpml/message/11848 /////// I'd like to believe Brown's team found something *really* interesting (e.g. 'Nemesis' [q.v.] - *NOT* to be confused in *any way* with PX!!!) You will please forgive my 'romanticism' where all things celestial are concerned -- I never did quite 'get over' my disappointment at the emergence of the (now accepted and proved) fact that Jupiter is a non-terrestrial body --- To this day, while regarding images of said planet, I all but pine for the rugged landscape which dosen't sprawl, dark and enchanting, beneath that enigmatic 'veil'... Sincerely Dan Sarandon PS - Thanks, To-Seek, for the 're-direct' to this thread! :-)
__________________
My formula for success is never to talk about a successful formula, because it's bound to go wrong! |
|
|||
|
Here's a BBC report from 2002 also citing Michael Brown:
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
This may be a stupid question but I am really not sure how orbiting works in space.
Is it safe to assume that since this object is orbiting the sun and is so far off that this will not be something that can pose a threat to earth. |
|
||||
|
Maybe they found sol b.
*crosses fingers* ![]()
__________________
My Music, 56k stream available -Check it out! |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
||||
|
In response to BmpBmp:
A 'worst case scenario' (Re: interference with Earth) may be found in be the 'Nemesis' theory (please pardon my abuse of the term!) - which holds that a relatively massive Oort cloud object periodically 'showers' the inner solar-system with 'preturbates' (i.e. comets & their ilk) -- said debris being perturbed in a fashion analogous to the 'wake' of an ocean-going vessel (albeit ‘inversely’ so)... Please note however that statistical analysis does *not* support said theory!!! :-) In any event the cosmos is a MACROscopic system! --- Please try to place matters in perspective! - As individuals - indeed as a species - our time is just to brief to offer us significant 'exposure'... :-) Best regards Dan Sarandon
__________________
My formula for success is never to talk about a successful formula, because it's bound to go wrong! |
|
||||
|
Hmmm..... I'm thinking, what with adjectives such as 'unusual' and 'mysterious' that perhaps we're talking something of the nature of a not-so-giant GMC??? :-)
OBTW --- There is little cause for concern that the object has a 'dangerous' orbit!!! --- The term 'distant' (in this sense) properly refers to an object's entire orbit - not merely its instantaneous position ![]() Sincerely Dan Sarandon
__________________
My formula for success is never to talk about a successful formula, because it's bound to go wrong! |