If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2004, 02:46 AM
RGClark RGClark is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 480
Default A closer Mars orbit as origin of its early warm,wet period.

Posted to uplink.space.com:


exoscientist
dust
10/25/04 10:42 PM
A closer Mars orbit as the cause of its early "warm, wet period." [re: exoscientist]


In reply to:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Planetary accretion in the inner Solar System [re: AlexBlackwell]

Thanks for the link. This reminds me of research on the position of planets at their formation and where they wind up:

Moving the Orbits of Planets
http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/je...b/migrate.html

This notes that present theories suggest some planets moved outwards while others moved inwards. There is also a paper on the outwards migration of Neptune in the August issue of Icarus.
I wonder if this can explain the "faint-Sun paradox" in regards to the Earth and Mars.
This is the problem that the Sun was supposed to be significantly fainter early in the life of the Solar System but both Earth and Mars show signs of liquid water carved channels at this early time.
This is a big part of the justification for the viewpoint of some Mars scientists that Mars was cold and dry early in its history because theories that propose greenhouse heating under a thicker atmosphere have difficulty getting the required amount of heating.
But perhaps the explanation lies in the possibility that these planets were closer to the Sun early on and that is what allowed them to have the extensive liquid water carved features.



Bob Clark



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A report to be presented to the Fall 2004 AGU meeting will argue that a Mars' orbit closer to the Sun may partially explained how Mars was able to remain warm enough for large scale water carved features to be formed early in its history:

======================================
0800h
AN: P21A-0211
TI: Mars Orbit and Temperature: Why and When an Early wet Mars
AU: * Leubner, I H
EM: ileubner@crystallizationcon.com
AF: Rochester Institute for Fundamental Research, 35 Hillcrest Drive, Penfield, NY 14526 United States
AB: It is the intent of this work to present a model which predicts the time when liquid water was present on Mars. Experimental evidence indicates that liquid water existed on the planet Mars at 2.9 - 3.4 billion years ago, when Mars was considered to be cold. A model is presented that predicts Mars orbit and temperature variations based on solar radiative and non-radiative (solar wind) mass losses which affect planetary orbits. Mars orbits are predicted between 198 and 206 million Km at its formation five billion years ago vs. presently 228 million Km. The correlation between the solar (radiative) constant and planetary orbit estimates the transition from liquid water to ice (273K) to have occurred at about 3.4-3.8 billion years before the present time, which is in good agreement with the experimental estimate (2.9 - 3.4 Byr). Additional effects that are expected to extend higher Mars surface temperatures closer to the present are discussed. Examples are the planetary cooling rate after formation and effects due to hothouse gases, like carbon dioxide and water vapor, and effects dependent on variations in solar volume.

======================================

These are non-peer reviewed abstracts of course.


Bob Clark
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2004, 02:53 PM
Launch window's Avatar
Launch window Launch window is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,830
Default

there have been ideas before that suggested that another planet Venus, may have experieced planetry migrations

nice article
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today