Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 31-October-2004, 05:27 PM
yearntolearn yearntolearn is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9
Send a message via MSN to yearntolearn
Default determining distance at superior conjunction

Sorry if this comes as a nuisance at all, but I'm desperate, so here's a pop quiz. Let's pretend there's a new planet whose orbit is closer to the sun than Mercury's. We'll call it planet Tron. Tron is located 0.1 AU from the sun. How would you determine Tron's distance from EARTH (whose disatance is 1 AU from the sun) at superior conjunction, after determining Tron's orbital period around the sun (using P^2=a^3, AKA Kepler's third law)? Is there some forumla for this that I missed out on?

All I can think of to do is figure Earth's distance from the sun MINUS Tron's distance from the sun, but that calculation doesn't take superior conjunction into account. It has to be a bit more complicated than such simple subtraction....

Thanks in advance for any help!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 31-October-2004, 07:05 PM
Andrew Andrew is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 313
Default

It would be earth's distance plus Tron's distance as they are on opposite sides of the sun. Around 1.1 AU if you're not particularly concerned with accuracy.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 31-October-2004, 07:43 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Williams Lake, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,522
Default

Seeing as how we can't see it at superior conjuction then we must infer the orbit from observed orbital elements. Make them what you wish.
__________________
When I am done here I think I will go create something from metal.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 31-October-2004, 08:35 PM
Normandy6644's Avatar
Normandy6644 Normandy6644 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ithaca, New York
Posts: 3,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan
Seeing as how we can't see it at superior conjuction then we must infer the orbit from observed orbital elements. Make them what you wish.
I would think that you can assume an inclination of 0 and just deal with semimajor axes. Though, I always get skeptical on problems where I think it seems too simple too.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-November-2004, 12:57 PM
yearntolearn yearntolearn is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9
Send a message via MSN to yearntolearn
Default

Thanks all! That was all too simple. I feel silly for having asked! Anyway, thanks to you, I have a good chance of passing my exam!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-November-2004, 01:30 PM
mickal555 mickal555 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,125
Send a message via ICQ to mickal555 Send a message via AIM to mickal555 Send a message via MSN to mickal555 Send a message via Yahoo to mickal555
Default

Welcome, and Good luck! :wink:
__________________
If this writing is blue you're going too fast!


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today