Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2004, 06:53 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 25,996
Default Black Holes or Galaxies, Which Came First?

Black Holes or Galaxies, Which Came First?

Quote:
Since supermassive black holes were first discovered, astronomers have been wondering if the hole was created first, and then the galaxy formed around it, or if these monsters tend to form at the heart of galaxies over time. Astronomers using the National Radio Astronomy Observatory's Very Large Array have discovered a distant galaxy that's less than a billion years old, but seems to have a supermassive black hole - but no massive bulge of stars. The black hole is 1 billion solar masses, so it should be surrounded by several trillion solar masses in stars. This provides evidence that it's the black hole that forms first, then the galaxy.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2004, 06:54 PM
pghnative's Avatar
pghnative pghnative is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,377
Default

You've been ToSeeked!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-November-2004, 08:31 PM
Glom's Avatar
Glom Glom is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West London, England
Posts: 8,412
Send a message via MSN to Glom
Default

pghnative ToSeeked my pointing out of ToSeek being ToSeeked.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2004, 08:05 AM
kg034 kg034 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SFO Bay Area, California
Posts: 136
Send a message via MSN to kg034 Send a message via Yahoo to kg034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghnative
You've been ToSeeked!
hehee ...scene from Scarface:
Bistro owner: "Hey, where you goin'? Come back and wash the dishes!"
Tony Montana: "You can wash the dishes yourself, mate.... I retire!
__________________
"Its full of stars!"
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2004, 10:09 AM
Glutomoto's Avatar
Glutomoto Glutomoto is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Edwardsville, Illinois
Posts: 157
Default Maybe the SMBH and the Galaxzy formed together.

Maybe the SMBH and the Galaxzy formed together, or that is what a discovery science channel program said.

Actually the program, Supermassive Black Holes claimed they were sure that both formed together, due to the relation(ratio?) of the size of the SMBH and the rotational speed of the stars(the Sigma) of the host galaxzy.

If this relationship is true, would that mean that less or no, dark matter is needed to explain why galaxzies spin so fast for their size ?

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-November-2004, 01:35 PM
ngc3314's Avatar
ngc3314 ngc3314 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 87.5W 33.2N
Posts: 1,712
Default Re: Maybe the SMBH and the Galaxzy formed together.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glutomoto
Maybe the SMBH and the Galaxzy formed together, or that is what a discovery science channel program said.

Actually the program, Supermassive Black Holes claimed they were sure that both formed together, due to the relation(ratio?) of the size of the SMBH and the rotational speed of the stars(the Sigma) of the host galaxzy.

If this relationship is true, would that mean that less or no, dark matter is needed to explain why galaxzies spin so fast for their size ?

Doesn't change things much - the "canonical" relation is that the SMBH has about 1/200 of the mass found in stars in the surrounding bulge, so not a significant part of the required "dark" matter at all.

This new report is quite cool - there have been a few suggestions as to how an SMBH could be formed without slowly eating material from its surroundings within a galaxy, and those preprints will start to look much jmore relevant...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today