|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Black Holes or Galaxies, Which Came First?
Quote:
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
...scene from Scarface:Bistro owner: "Hey, where you goin'? Come back and wash the dishes!" Tony Montana: "You can wash the dishes yourself, mate.... I retire!
__________________
"Its full of stars!" |
|
||||
|
Maybe the SMBH and the Galaxzy formed together, or that is what a discovery science channel program said.
Actually the program, Supermassive Black Holes claimed they were sure that both formed together, due to the relation(ratio?) of the size of the SMBH and the rotational speed of the stars(the Sigma) of the host galaxzy. If this relationship is true, would that mean that less or no, dark matter is needed to explain why galaxzies spin so fast for their size ? ![]() |
|
||||
|
Quote:
This new report is quite cool - there have been a few suggestions as to how an SMBH could be formed without slowly eating material from its surroundings within a galaxy, and those preprints will start to look much jmore relevant... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|