Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-June-2005, 04:53 PM
GurneyHalleck GurneyHalleck is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: near JSC
Posts: 34
Default NASA funding - now vs then

I read this in a news article today about Griffin's (NASA's new head honcho) visit to the Johnson Space Center:

"Griffin said the agency has received a steady flow of funding that when adjusted for inflation is comparable to the funding the agency had when it first sent astronauts to the moon during the Apollo program of the 1960s and early 1970s."

This is completely wrong, isn't it? I have always thought that funding back then was huge compared to today.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-June-2005, 05:17 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 9,968
Default NASA funding - now vs then

http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/history/apollo/
Quote:
After the last lunar landing, total funding for the Apollo program was about $19,408,134,000. The budget allocation was 34 percent of the NASA budget.
Not sure of the exact number of years, but we are within the ballpark of a few billion per year.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-June-2005, 05:22 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is online now
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,032
Default

It's probably about right. NASA's budget back then was around $4 billion; today it's around $16 billion. And the accumulated inflation rate, 1970-2005, is about 400%.

What has changed is NASA's share of the federal budget: In 1970, it was $4 billion out of $200 billion - 2% of the total budget. If that share had been maintained, today NASA would be spending over $40 billion a year.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-June-2005, 05:27 PM
kucharek's Avatar
kucharek kucharek is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany, Old Europe
Posts: 4,148
Default

I guess, they paid less bureaucrats and more engineers in the Sixties.
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-June-2005, 08:33 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharek
I guess, they paid less bureaucrats and more engineers in the Sixties.
True, in part. Bureaucracy grows over time, especially in government. It also helps to have a specific goal. And, it is important to remember that the inflation rate is an average. Aerospace costs have tended to grow faster than inflation. One of the more interesting questions in private space development is if the cost growth is a fact of life ("space is hard") or if it is an artifact of an industry where there hasn't been that much incentive to keep the costs down. Perhaps new blood will change the picture, as it did for the computer industry. Or perhaps not. We'll just have to see.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-June-2005, 10:03 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is online now
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,032
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn
Aerospace costs have tended to grow faster than inflation.
I saw an essay once that demonstrated that if trends continue, the entire US defense budget in 2071 would buy exactly one fighter plane.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today