|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I read this in a news article today about Griffin's (NASA's new head honcho) visit to the Johnson Space Center:
"Griffin said the agency has received a steady flow of funding that when adjusted for inflation is comparable to the funding the agency had when it first sent astronauts to the moon during the Apollo program of the 1960s and early 1970s." This is completely wrong, isn't it? I have always thought that funding back then was huge compared to today. |
|
||||
|
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/history/apollo/
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
It's probably about right. NASA's budget back then was around $4 billion; today it's around $16 billion. And the accumulated inflation rate, 1970-2005, is about 400%.
What has changed is NASA's share of the federal budget: In 1970, it was $4 billion out of $200 billion - 2% of the total budget. If that share had been maintained, today NASA would be spending over $40 billion a year.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|