Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3331 (permalink)  
Old 27-November-2007, 10:52 AM
Arneb's Avatar
Arneb Arneb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 2,267
Default

I hope you don't count this as another question, as I only request a clarification: When I asked about a star-forming region, I was thinking of stellar nurseries or regions of high rates of star formation specifically, not just any star formation. Like in, tarantula nebula vs. the rest of the LMC, Orion nebula vs. the entire Milky Way, etc.

Is it star-forming in this sense?
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem.
Reply With Quote
  #3332 (permalink)  
Old 27-November-2007, 12:01 PM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default

Quote:
Is it star-forming in this sense?
Yes, it is indeed, Arneb.

Dave Mitsky
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #3333 (permalink)  
Old 27-November-2007, 01:44 PM
George's Avatar
George George is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio, Tx.
Posts: 7,209
Default

Is it < 1 million lyrs. distance?
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh.

"The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly.
Reply With Quote
  #3334 (permalink)  
Old 27-November-2007, 03:34 PM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default

14. No, it is not less than 1 million light years distant.
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #3335 (permalink)  
Old 27-November-2007, 09:45 PM
George's Avatar
George George is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio, Tx.
Posts: 7,209
Default

< 3.1 million light years distant?
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh.

"The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly.
Reply With Quote
  #3336 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2007, 06:54 AM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default

15. Yes, it's closer than 3.1 million light years.
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #3337 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2007, 08:37 AM
Eroica's Avatar
Eroica Eroica is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dubh Linn
Posts: 3,622
Default

Is it in the constellation of Andromeda?
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others.
Reply With Quote
  #3338 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2007, 09:36 AM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default

16. No, it's not in Andromeda.
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #3339 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2007, 11:48 AM
crosscountry's Avatar
crosscountry crosscountry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texan in Texas
Posts: 4,514
Default

I'm thinking some people have never played this game before. Look at all those "No" answers. THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO SPECIFIC


1. Yes, it's larger than an astronomical bread box (1 cu. lyr).
2. No, it is not located within the Milky Way.
3. Yes, it lies within the Local Group.
4. No, it isn't a galaxy.
5. Yes, it is visible within the range of human seeing.
6. Yes, it's nebular.
7. No, it's not the Tarantula.
8. Yes, stars are being formed there.
9. No, it's not located in one of the Magellanic Clouds.
10. No, it does not reside in M31.
11. No, it is not less than 1 hour 5 minutes in right ascension.
12. No, it's not in M33.
13. No, it's not less than 11 hours of right ascension.
14. No, it is not less than 1 million light years distant.
15. Yes, it's closer than 3.1 million light years.
16. No, it's not in Andromeda.
__________________
"I will do my best to understand and explain the universe from big to small without invoking miracles, unrepeatable events, or divine intervention. In place of those things I will use observations, mathematics, and science."


-Cross
My travel blog

Some of my Astrophotography


Those that lack education have a hard time understanding its value. - Cross
Reply With Quote
  #3340 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2007, 11:53 AM
crosscountry's Avatar
crosscountry crosscountry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texan in Texas
Posts: 4,514
Default

4. No, it isn't a galaxy.
10. No, it does not reside in M31.
15. Yes, it's closer than 3.1 million light years.
16. No, it's not in Andromeda.


Dave, Can we get that last question back since we already had the answer? twice

And Eroica you asked questions 10, 15, and 16. Pay attention will ya?


My question, is it within the range of a 6in, 150cm telescope?
__________________
"I will do my best to understand and explain the universe from big to small without invoking miracles, unrepeatable events, or divine intervention. In place of those things I will use observations, mathematics, and science."


-Cross
My travel blog

Some of my Astrophotography


Those that lack education have a hard time understanding its value. - Cross
Reply With Quote
  #3341 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2007, 12:23 PM
George's Avatar
George George is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio, Tx.
Posts: 7,209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry View Post
4. No, it isn't a galaxy.
10. No, it does not reside in M31.
15. Yes, it's closer than 3.1 million light years.
16. No, it's not in Andromeda.


Dave, Can we get that last question back since we already had the answer? twice

And Eroica you asked questions 10, 15, and 16. Pay attention will ya?
Never underestimate Eroica. There are ~ 13 galaxies in the constellation of Andromeda that are considered in the Local Group, or are strong candidates for becoming members.

Take a look at this list and it will make more sense where these questions are headed.
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh.

"The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly.
Reply With Quote
  #3342 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2007, 01:26 PM
crosscountry's Avatar
crosscountry crosscountry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texan in Texas
Posts: 4,514
Default

oh yea, I read the answers and not the question. oops.
__________________
"I will do my best to understand and explain the universe from big to small without invoking miracles, unrepeatable events, or divine intervention. In place of those things I will use observations, mathematics, and science."


-Cross
My travel blog

Some of my Astrophotography


Those that lack education have a hard time understanding its value. - Cross
Reply With Quote
  #3343 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2007, 03:46 PM
Eroica's Avatar
Eroica Eroica is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dubh Linn
Posts: 3,622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George View Post
Never underestimate Eroica. There are ~ 13 galaxies in the constellation of Andromeda that are considered in the Local Group, or are strong candidates for becoming members.

Take a look at this list and it will make more sense where these questions are headed.
Thank you, George!

Crosscountry, sometimes No is a better answer than Yes. In this case I was hoping the answer was no as it eliminates more than a dozen Local Group Galaxies. (By the way, I did not ask question 15. That was George.)
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others.
Reply With Quote
  #3344 (permalink)  
Old 28-November-2007, 03:54 PM
Eroica's Avatar
Eroica Eroica is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dubh Linn
Posts: 3,622
Default

It seems that the object we are looking for is in one of the following galaxies:

Barnard's Galaxy (NGC 6822)
Tucana Dwarf Galaxy
Pegasus Dwarf Irregular Galaxy

I'm beginning to think of the Bubble Nebula and the Ring Nebula.

Is it in Barnard's Galaxy?
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others.
Reply With Quote
  #3345 (permalink)  
Old 29-November-2007, 04:48 AM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default

17. Yes, it's located in Barnard's Galaxy.
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #3346 (permalink)  
Old 29-November-2007, 05:49 AM
Arneb's Avatar
Arneb Arneb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 2,267
Default

Is it Hubble X?
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem.
Reply With Quote
  #3347 (permalink)  
Old 29-November-2007, 01:10 PM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arneb View Post
Is it Hubble X?
Hmm, why not Hubble V?

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap011225.html

18. Yes, it is indeed Hubble X.

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap010216.html

http://www.spaceimages.com/hubblex.html

Bingo, Arneb, you got it!

Dave Mitsky
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #3348 (permalink)  
Old 29-November-2007, 01:35 PM
George's Avatar
George George is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio, Tx.
Posts: 7,209
Default

18, not bad!!
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh.

"The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly.
Reply With Quote
  #3349 (permalink)  
Old 29-November-2007, 02:12 PM
Dave Mitsky's Avatar
Dave Mitsky Dave Mitsky is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,843
Default

George,

Actually, I thought that it would be far fewer than 18 after Eroica posed the question about the Local Group.

Dave Mitsky
__________________
Chance favors the prepared mind.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #3350 (permalink)  
Old 29-November-2007, 02:27 PM
George's Avatar
George George is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio, Tx.
Posts: 7,209
Default

I like this thread because it is such a fun way to learn. I had no idea that there were so many galaxies so close to us.

Since you posed a stellar nursery class of question, it had to be reasonably close.
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh.

"The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly.
Reply With Quote
  #3351 (permalink)  
Old 29-November-2007, 03:48 PM
Arneb's Avatar
Arneb Arneb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 2,267