|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Is it between the two belts (asteroid and Kuiper)? What nationality is this athelete? [a 2 in 1 attempt :wink: ]
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh. "The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly. |
|
||||
|
Well, I suppose somewhere in Java or Sumatra, there may well be some Tiger Woods.
Or in India, of course. Does the structure have the surname of a sportsman, or the full name?
__________________
Knowledge is a curse, but ignorance is worse |
|
||||
|
Coincidence is the key here - The name denotes someone entirely different, the identitiy of the names is pure coincidence.
First or surname - sorry, but that would be a big hint. It's one word, though. Yes, it is between the belts. Nationality - no way, man 8) Edit: Ah, one more point: I am from Europe. There is no such thing as a "famous" baseball or a "famous" American football player. That would be an oxymoron. I mean, seriously. 8)
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Maybe one final hint: The sportsman I am thinking of is not active anymore.
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
player "of some note" but THE ABSOLUTELY MOST SUBLIMELY FANTASTIC FOOTBALL PLAYER THIS POOR EARTH EVER HAD THE UNBELIEVABLE PRIVILEGE TO ADORE! =D> =D> =D> Good going, formulaterp :wink: So what's the next question? ![]()
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() with regards
__________________
All words, phrases, definitions and theories provided in the above post are, unless otherwise stated, the property of Champion Munch © 2005. Sign up to sue the Sun |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem. |
|
|||
Whaddyaspect? I'm an American afterall. Actually I've attended 2 World Cup matches, one here and also in France. Hopefully I'll get a chance to visit Germany in 2006. Here's my question (along the same lines as Arneb) on what Solar System body would you find a structure named Yalta? And don't say the Earth. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Who coined the term aurora borealis?
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Later archeologists will (hopefully) be able to establish that this painting was not painted before or after a certain time. Why? (Sorry that the link leads to a woo-woo site, but you do not find that painting on the Internet very frequently)
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
But as I figure it, this painting is a historically accurate representation of the night sky as seen by Pieter Pauwel Rubens. The geometric (dare I say Masonic) relationship between the planet Saturn and the Belt of Orion, as depicted in the painting, could only have occurred once during Rubens' adult life. My extensive research, which mostly involved running time backwards for 400 years in Celestia, conclusively places the timeframe as the winter of 1620 (give or take). Oddly enough this particular perspective could only have been achieved from the southern hemisphere. Recently declassified CIA documents show that Rubens travelled extensively throughout his life. As a diplomatic envoy for the king, Rubens visited France, Spain and Italy among other countries. However there were no indications he ever crossed the equator. This is clear proof that this work of art could only have been created while hanging from the cieling! Archealogists, should they ever deign to examine my theory, may one day exhume Rubens' body. An examination of his upper canine teeth will clearly prove that one of the great artists of the Renaissance period was in fact a Masonic Vampire!!! PS: I should warn you that I am posting this after imbibing a great deal of alcohol and spending the entire night awake following a friend-of-a-friend's exploits at the final table at the World Series of Poker. |
|
||||
|
[Original post deleted by mistake due to hitting "edit" instead of "post reply" - sorry folks!]
Ummm, ahh, is there anyoneout there?[listens into the dark despondently] Ahhh, maybe with a new hint! The title of the painting is "Chronos devouring one of his sons". Chronos is the GREEK name. :wink:
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
And no, Uranus is not in the picture.
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
For a little more see this thread
__________________
We all know those Venusians: Doing their hair in shock waves, smoking electrical coronas, wearing Van Allen belts and resting their tiny elbows on a Geiger counter... John Sladek, The New Apocrypha, pg 34. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Sunset Die Sonne scheidet hinter dem Gebirge. In alle Täler steigt der Abend nieder mit seinen Schatten, die voll Kühlung sind. |
|
||||
|
good going, melusine - I disagree with you: You are not stumped, you are absolutely on the right track - "What are the three objects?" is the crucial point, and herein lies the solution.
As I said, a decisive hint (a dead giveaway rather) can be found in the material presented during this quiz (not very long ago, actually).
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem. |