Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #2431 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2007, 09:23 AM
Eroica's Avatar
Eroica Eroica is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dubh Linn
Posts: 3,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozark1 View Post
Crux is 1501. That's 250 years too old.

Hint: there are three possible answers.
Carina, Puppis and Vela?
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others.
Reply With Quote
  #2432 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2007, 09:24 AM
Eroica's Avatar
Eroica Eroica is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dubh Linn
Posts: 3,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hhEb09'1 View Post
Thanks, Eroica. I just looked at the illustrations on page 987, and was amazed. I did not realize that, before. Very interesting question.
You're welcome.
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others.
Reply With Quote
  #2433 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2007, 12:03 PM
maryccc's Avatar
maryccc maryccc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozark1 View Post
Crux is 1501. That's 250 years too old.

Hint: there are three possible answers.
I found this in the wilkipedia. According to this Crux wasn't given constellation status until 1930.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asterism_%28astronomy%29
The Southern Cross is not an asterism, but merely a variation on the meaning of Crux. Crux was an asterism when Bayer created it in Uranometria (1603) from stars in the hind legs of Centaurus. It was given constellation status in 1930, thereby mutilating the Centaur.
Reply With Quote
  #2434 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2007, 04:32 PM
ozark1 ozark1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maryccc View Post
I found this in the wilkipedia. According to this Crux wasn't given constellation status until 1930.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asterism_%28astronomy%29
The Southern Cross is not an asterism, but merely a variation on the meaning of Crux. Crux was an asterism when Bayer created it in Uranometria (1603) from stars in the hind legs of Centaurus. It was given constellation status in 1930, thereby mutilating the Centaur.
The problem is that all 88 constellations were made official in 1930. I take the point that Crux was an asterism when first proposed in 1501. However the line between constellation and asterism is not firm.

However the constellations Vela, Puppis and Carina were only invented in 1763 by Lacaille. His dim southern constellations were invented in 1750-54. This makes three of the more noticeable constellations the youngest in the sky.

Anyone got an answer for the defunct constellation yet?
Reply With Quote
  #2435 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2007, 06:34 PM
maryccc's Avatar
maryccc maryccc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozark1 View Post
The problem is that all 88 constellations were made official in 1930. I take the point that Crux was an asterism when first proposed in 1501. However the line between constellation and asterism is not firm.

However the constellations Vela, Puppis and Carina were only invented in 1763 by Lacaille. His dim southern constellations were invented in 1750-54. This makes three of the more noticeable constellations the youngest in the sky.

Anyone got an answer for the defunct constellation yet?
Any clues

Last edited by maryccc; 10-January-2007 at 07:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2436 (permalink)  
Old 10-January-2007, 07:02 PM
maryccc's Avatar
maryccc maryccc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozark1 View Post
The problem is that all 88 constellations were made official in 1930. I take the point that Crux was an asterism when first proposed in 1501. However the line between constellation and asterism is not firm.

However the constellations Vela, Puppis and Carina were only invented in 1763 by Lacaille. His dim southern constellations were invented in 1750-54. This makes three of the more noticeable constellations the youngest in the sky.

Anyone got an answer for the defunct constellation yet?
Actually Abbe Nicholas Louis de Lacaille separated the constellation that was invented by Ptolemy which was called Argo Navis and Lacaille made it into 3 different constellations. Carina, Puppis and Vela. If he hadn't separated them Argo would have been the largest constellation.
Reply With Quote
  #2437 (permalink)  
Old 11-January-2007, 07:07 AM
Arneb's Avatar
Arneb Arneb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 2,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozark1
Anyone got an answer for the defunct constellation yet?
Bode lists a constellation noctua (the night owl) in his 1801 Uranometria. It was very small and comprised stars now listed in Hydra.

That would mean it's Eroica's turn again, wouldn't it?
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem.
Reply With Quote
  #2438 (permalink)  
Old 11-January-2007, 04:37 PM
ozark1 ozark1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arneb View Post
Bode lists a constellation noctua (the night owl) in his 1801 Uranometria. It was very small and comprised stars now listed in Hydra.

That would mean it's Eroica's turn again, wouldn't it?
No it means its your turn!

Actually the link is to a picture of the Urania's Mirror (1825) after Jamieson (1822). http://www.ianridpath.com/atlases/urania.htm

Bode shows Turdus Solitarius http://www.ianridpath.com/startales/solitaire.htm in 1801.

This makes noctua (and norma nilotica) the last of the major obsolete constellations.
Reply With Quote
  #2439 (permalink)  
Old 12-January-2007, 01:14 PM
maryccc's Avatar
maryccc maryccc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 169
Default

I wish there was an easy question
Reply With Quote
  #2440 (permalink)  
Old 12-January-2007, 04:48 PM
Arneb's Avatar
Arneb Arneb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 2,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozark1 View Post
No it means its your turn!
Ah, I thought the obsolete constellation question was just an extra...

Hmmm, have to think of something. Hang on a little
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem.
Reply With Quote
  #2441 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2007, 04:24 PM
ozark1 ozark1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arneb View Post
Ah, I thought the obsolete constellation question was just an extra...

Hmmm, have to think of something. Hang on a little
Come on Arneb!

A question to get everyone thinking in the meantime - when does Polaris rise in Johannesburg?
Reply With Quote
  #2442 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2007, 04:30 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 8,224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozark1 View Post
A question to get everyone thinking in the meantime - when does Polaris rise in Johannesburg?
Right now, since Johannesburg is 26 degrees south of the equator, Polaris is not visible at all. Let's see, Vega is visible though, and in 12000 years, Vega will be the pole star, and Polaris will be circumpolar, so sometime between now and then...
Reply With Quote
  #2443 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2007, 04:49 PM
ozark1 ozark1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 319
Default

Yes, exactly right.

Similarly wait long enough and Crux and Alpha Centauri will rise even from London.
Reply With Quote
  #2444 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2007, 07:53 PM
Arneb's Avatar
Arneb Arneb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 2,295
Default

Apologies to everyone! I spent the weekend working at the hospital more or less all the time; and went home sick afterwards.

Please hhEb09'1, carry on!
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem.
Reply With Quote
  #2445 (permalink)  
Old 19-January-2007, 02:11 AM
Arneb's Avatar
Arneb Arneb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 2,295
Default

Since hhEb09'1 hasn't come up with a question, I'll try to make up for my missed question of last week. Let's see how much you'll have to bludgeon me for this haiku:

Comets, and the Moon
Beer - good to make a living
Star-castle my home.

Says who?
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem.
Reply With Quote
  #2446 (permalink)  
Old 19-January-2007, 09:32 PM
evanoconnor evanoconnor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 130
Default The beer is a stretch

Tycho?

He has a comet, 1577; a crater of course on the moon. He has a castle built called "castle of the heavens". And he had a pet elk which died after stumbling down the stairs after have to much beer.
Reply With Quote
  #2447 (permalink)  
Old 19-January-2007, 10:07 PM
Arneb's Avatar
Arneb Arneb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 2,295
Default

Plausible explanation, but it's not Tycho. As you say, the beer is a bit off...
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem.
Reply With Quote
  #2448 (permalink)  
Old 20-January-2007, 04:03 AM
crosscountry's Avatar
crosscountry crosscountry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texan in Texas
Posts: 4,616
Default

Tycho was my first guess too.


William Lassell
__________________
"I will do my best to understand and explain the universe from big to small without invoking miracles, unrepeatable events, or divine intervention. In place of those things I will use observations, mathematics, and science."


-Cross
My travel blog

Some of my Astrophotography


Those that lack education have a hard time understanding its value. - Cross
Reply With Quote
  #2449 (permalink)  
Old 20-January-2007, 07:28 AM
ozark1 ozark1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arneb View Post
Since hhEb09'1 hasn't come up with a question, I'll try to make up for my missed question of last week. Let's see how much you'll have to bludgeon me for this haiku:

Comets, and the Moon
Beer - good to make a living
Star-castle my home.

Says who?
Johannes Hevelius.

Discovered four comets (including Ikeya-Zhang), father of lunar topography - Selenographia sive Lunae Descriptio (1647), born into a family of brewers and head of the Danzig Brewing Guild 1643 - 1687. His observatory was "Sternenburg" after Tycho's 'Stjerneborg' - Starry Castle. It was built on top of his house.
Reply With Quote
  #2450 (permalink)  
Old 21-January-2007, 07:59 PM
Arneb's Avatar
Arneb Arneb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 2,295
Default

I'd like to add that he also published a book named "Cometographie", which justified cramming comets and the Moon into one line.

Very neat, ozark - congratulations, and your turn.
__________________
Non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem.
Reply With Quote
  #2451 (permalink)