Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-July-2005, 08:19 PM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 8,645
Default American Astronomical Society and the Space Vision

The American Astronomical Society has released a statement about the Space Vision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AAS
*AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY STATEMENT*

*ON THE VISION FOR SPACE EXPLORATION
Adopted 11 July 2005
*

The American Astronomical Society urges that a vigorous, focused program of scientific research form the core of the implementation of the Vision for Space Exploration. The President's initiative for the civilian space program places emphasis on exploration of the Moon, Mars, and beyond by humans and robots. Science is exploration, whether it involves directly sampling the surface of Mars, or gathering in the faint and ancient light of distant galaxies. Exploration without science is tourism.

The adventure of exploration will capture the hearts of Americans: but the scientific discoveries that come from that exploration will capture their minds. Scientific discoveries from NASA's new space program will provide its most meaningful legacy. We are learning where we are, where we came from, and we have discovered surprising new features of the way the world works. Based on NASA's leadership in space science, we see the Earth as one planet among many we can now study, we see the origin of chemical and biological matter as woven into the history of cosmic change, and we have learned the surprising fact that, on the largest scales, our Universe is not organized by the material we can see, but is made mostly of dark matter and governed by the properties of a mysterious dark energy we have only recently discovered. We have much to explore. The Universe holds a great deal of "beyond."

Science is essential to implement the Vision for Space Exploration. New technologies to implement the Vision for Space Exploration will depend on scientific advances, and, in turn, will afford new opportunities for scientific work. These notions are laid out in the June 2004 report of the President's Commission on Implementation of United States Exploration Policy and National Research Council's assessment: Science in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration. As we learn how to explore, we will create opportunities for better scientific research, for more stimulating science education, and we will contribute toward our nation's ability to compete in a world based on technology.

We are all explorers whenever we encounter something new. By motivating Exploration for scientific purposes, the Vision for Space Exploration will benefit science and society. The great successes of space science in the past decades arise from a strong partnership between NASA and the scientific community. The astronomical community, through its decadal surveys and other consultations has set priorities, and worked with NASA to make these dreams into reality. The astronomical community embraces the opportunity to continue to work with NASA to implement the Vision for Space Exploration on a sound scientific basis with broad input from the scientific community.
__________________
Phil Plait
The Bad Astronomer
http://www.badastronomy.com
badastro@badastronomy.com
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-July-2005, 09:21 PM
ngc3314's Avatar
ngc3314 ngc3314 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 87.5W 33.2N
Posts: 1,717
Default Re: American Astronomical Society and the Space Vision

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer
The American Astronomical Society has released a statement about the Space Vision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AAS
Exploration without science is tourism.

(Yes, I abridged that to the bumper-sticker version!)

For bystanders, I might throw in some of the background to this carefully-worded statement. Somewhat more than half of astronomical research funding to individual scientists in the US has come from NASA for some years now, a fact which both flows from and encouraged the extraordinary success of a whole range of spaceborne astronomy missions. Those astronomers who don't work on planets that we might send astronauts too have seen the embace of the Vision for Space Exploration as threatening, in the sense that NASA management has at various times seemed to work toward that being the only thing NASA does. Not only was this a subtext many read into the HST servicing decision by Sean O'Keefe, but it has been read into the cancellation or (indefinite?) postponement of several long-running NASA programs (such as the Astrophysics Data Program), and the vanishing of most of the planed missions beyond JWST into what looks like bureaucratic limbo. It's not too much to say that a lot of astronomers have looked at these decisions and, in effect, seen the NASA administration giving them a rude gesture and saying "Thanks for all your teamwork and careful planning over the least decades which helped the Agency look good and be a world leader in science. Now that we've got our marching orders for Buck Rogers, try not to let the airlock door hit you on the way out". (It was interesting to hear Griffin's congressional testimony on C-SPAN in which he said that a firewall had to be in place so that, among oither things, JWST cost overruns didn't impact the human spaceflight effort. I can scarcely imagine even those overruns reaching the level of programmatic uncertainty in implementing the Vision...)

A perennial underlying concern is interruption of the thread of expertise, something X-ray astronomers have had to fight several times. No missions = no support for students in the relevant fields = less young, energetic talent available when new missions appear. What particularly worries me, and has since right before the HST decision was first announced, is that NASA could be loading virtually all its effort on a single project, which could well be shut down by either political or technical factors ten years from now, while ESA and to a lesser extent JAXA and the Russian program have continued a modest but steady deep-space science effort.

(I'm willing to edit if the BA tells me this got a bit too polemical - but I think it's an accurate description of how lots of US astronomers are thinking these days)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-July-2005, 09:24 PM
Manchurian Taikonaut's Avatar
Manchurian Taikonaut Manchurian Taikonaut is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sol's pale blue dot
Posts: 1,645
Default

The much of Vision is very good, I'm glad that the American Astronomical Society have stated their position. NASA needed a new push and goals and the scientists needed a key direction to go in, there is a lot happening in this decade of planet exploration. People were happy to see a new Plan for Mars yet some Scientists offered cautious praise for the Bush Plan. Already the American Astronomical Society has been concerned about 'arbitrary' cancellation in the President's budget of NASA-sponsored missions, and the Hubble situation has divided a number of people, maybe not just because of cost or the rescue plan for the HST but how it was handled in front of the public. Some of the Administration's top science advisors have taled to a group of American scientists and astronomers, with a stern message about getting the scientific house 'in order' and develop a more 'managerial' approach to the business of doing science. There are no problems in the USA's Space industry, the US have done some of the greatest missions that will ever be seen by Mankind, the Voyagers, Apollo on the Moon, the Viking on Mars. However trouble starts to come when un forseen Economic problems arise or US political problems begin to weigh on NASA. Hubble Space Telescope was expensive and over-budget but its has made its mark on the USA and give us some of the greatest scientific discovery. Back during the Apollo days everyone was saying that in 10 years time Amercians would be walking on Mars, but unforseen budget problems arose and the public were unhappy with NASA spending. One of the most important thing for NASA is to play things well, push ahead with the good science and don't let things go way off or over-bidget and go ahead with the right parts of the vision and keep moving forward like the did during their other great missions.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 13-July-2005, 05:22 AM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,877
Default

Good news on the Northern front. Marc Garneau (President of the CSA and Canada's first astronaut) is lobbying for Canadian funding and participation in any US manned Moon or Mars mission. Hopefully we'll be able to help. And hopefully we can catch a ride.
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 13-July-2005, 05:58 AM
Tobin Dax's Avatar
Tobin Dax Tobin Dax is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Middle of Nowhere, Kentucky
Posts: 3,308
Default

Thanks for posting this, BA. It now adorns my office door. (I needed something new for that spot, and this is worth it.)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today