Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 20-July-2005, 07:52 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,311
Default Time to revamp the periodic table?

Elemental
Is it time to revamp the periodic table?


Quote:
Oxford ecologist Philip Stewart has designed a new periodic table of the elements, and it's a hit. American schools are placing orders daily for Stewart's table, and the Royal Society of Chemists recently sent a copy to every British secondary school. Stewart's is the only remake to achieve widespread adoption since Dmitri Mendeleev invented the original periodic table in a fit of brilliance in 1869.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 20-July-2005, 08:06 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,235
Default Re: Time to revamp the periodic table?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
I do wish Stewart's design would eliminate the meaningless galaxy image. It's just noise.

I've posted this before. A collection of periodic tables: Chemogenesis.

It points to another collection of Periodic Table Styles.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 20-July-2005, 08:08 PM
pghnative's Avatar
pghnative pghnative is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,205
Default

I don't like it. To see some connections you have to follow arrows. The visual link from the grid pattern on the current chart to the filling of electron orbitals is gone.

It won't catch on.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 20-July-2005, 08:23 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,311
Default Re: Time to revamp the periodic table?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01101001
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
I do wish Stewart's design would eliminate the meaningless galaxy image. It's just noise.
Someone on Slashdot made the same point, and I have to agree with them. Also, the circles representing the elements are made small just so the meaningless but pretty galaxy image isn't obscured. Not good visual design, but perhaps it would be possible to come up with another one that preserves the essence of the concept with a better presentation.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 20-July-2005, 08:26 PM
pghnative's Avatar
pghnative pghnative is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,205
Default Re: Time to revamp the periodic table?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01101001
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
I do wish Stewart's design would eliminate the meaningless galaxy image. It's just noise.
Someone on Slashdot made the same point, and I have to agree with them. Also, the circles representing the elements are made small just so the meaningless but pretty galaxy image isn't obscured. Not good visual design, but perhaps it would be possible to come up with another one that preserves the essence of the concept with a better presentation.
Well that would be the next slide of the slideshow after the galaxy one, wouldn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 20-July-2005, 09:23 PM
Eta C's Avatar
Eta C Eta C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Heart of Darkness
Posts: 1,596
Default

The galaxy image is what Edward Tufte (The Visual Display of Quantitative Information) would call chartjunk, namely a graphic element that distracts the viewer from what is really important in the graph or visualization. The old version of the spiral shown on the next slide of the show is superior to the "pretty picutre" in all ways, but I personally don't see it as superior to the traditional layout. Call me old-fashioned I guess. :wink:
__________________
"I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind." - William Thompson, 1st Baron Lord Kelvin

"If it was so, it might be, and if it were so, it would be, but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic!" - Tweedledee

This isn't right. This isn't even wrong. - Wolfgang Pauli
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 20-July-2005, 11:11 PM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
Default

You nailed it. More crud from the viewgraph/powerpoint generation.

The book The Periodic Kingdom shows a nice alternate 3D model that shows relationships better.

The superatoms/superchemistry genre may need a chart of its own one day.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today