Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 11:45 AM
username24 username24 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 49
Send a message via Yahoo to username24
Default Is this new planet the only planet outside the planet disc?

Is this new planet the only planet outside the planet disc?
I read the it is 45 degrees from the planet disc, why is this the case.


so in real life do we see the solar system like this


.................................................. ...................................new planetO
(from my drawing you see that the new planet is 45 degrees upward)
sunO......marsO......earthO....jupitorO..mercuryO. .saturnO...niptuneO....plutoO.....


What do you think of my above drawing, kind of cool, ha
__________________
afbS
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 11:49 AM
Laguna2's Avatar
Laguna2 Laguna2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Reiskirchen, Germany
Posts: 2,071
Send a message via ICQ to Laguna2
Default Re: Is this new planet the only planet outside the planet di

Quote:
Originally Posted by username24
Is this new planet the only planet outside the planet disc?
I read the it is 45 degrees from the planet disc, why is this the case.
No, Pluto and the other newfound "Planets" are outside too.
__________________
"Who does not know anything, must believe everything."
Baroness Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach
1830-1916
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 11:51 AM
Champion_Munch's Avatar
Champion_Munch Champion_Munch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 27º 29' 37" S - 153º 04' 55" E
Posts: 913
Send a message via MSN to Champion_Munch
Default Re: Is this new planet the only planet outside the planet di

Quote:
Originally Posted by username24

What do you think of my above drawing, kind of cool, ha
:-s

Man, I must be more tired than I thought. #-o

with regards
__________________
All words, phrases, definitions and theories provided in the above post are, unless otherwise stated, the property of Champion Munch © 2005.

Sign up to sue the Sun
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 05:56 PM
novaderrik novaderrik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ashby, MN, USA
Posts: 2,504
Default

the only fault i can find with your drawing is the order of the planets around the Jupiter/Mercury binary system...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 05:59 PM
azazul azazul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rio Hondo, TX
Posts: 368
Default

You do realize that Pluto is inclined 17 degrees from the ecliptic, right?
__________________
www.csphysmath.com
BAUT Team Stats
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 06:08 PM
Ara Pacis's Avatar
Ara Pacis Ara Pacis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: between the candle and the star.
Posts: 2,115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azazul
You do realize that Pluto is inclined 17 degrees from the ecliptic, right?
Another reason to demote Pluto to a non-planet.
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 06:14 PM
azazul azazul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rio Hondo, TX
Posts: 368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ara Pacis
Another reason to demote Pluto to a non-planet.
I have to agree there, I have long thought that Pluto should not be a planet. Its size says enough, it is smaller than many moons in our solar system. When you take into consideration that it is not very close to the plane of the rest of the planets, then it seems obvious to me that it should not be a planet.

Yesterday, I ate with my parents and happened to mention that I thought Pluto should be demoted. They reacted as many others have, saying that it always has been a planet. To me that is no reason to leave it as a planet. If you live much of your life calling a floor a ceiling, when you find out evidence that you have called it the wrong thing all your life, do you continue to call it by the wrong name? I wouldn't.
__________________
www.csphysmath.com
BAUT Team Stats
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 06:57 PM
Ara Pacis's Avatar
Ara Pacis Ara Pacis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: between the candle and the star.
Posts: 2,115
Default

Azuzal, Maybe we could convince people that a planet is a plane-t meaning it should be in the same plane as all the rest. I'm not sure if the t should mean anything special. Maybe something off of the plane could be called a planoff. Maybe there could be an eccentricity limit as well.
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 07:08 PM
RBG RBG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azazul
To me that is no reason to leave it as a planet. If you live much of your life calling a floor a ceiling, when you find out evidence that you have called it the wrong thing all your life, do you continue to call it by the wrong name? I wouldn't.
So what do you call Indians, now?

RBG
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 07:09 PM
TravisM's Avatar
TravisM TravisM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,221
Send a message via MSN to TravisM Send a message via Yahoo to TravisM
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novaderrik
the only fault i can find with your drawing is the order of the planets around the Jupiter/Mercury binary system...
I noticed that too... It should be something like:

Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto ...
__________________

Feynman
>~~~~<
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.

Religion is a culture of faith; science is a culture of doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 07:14 PM
formulaterp formulaterp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 325
Send a message via Yahoo to formulaterp
Default

RBG,

They are called Indians. Unless you meant the folks who were native to the Americas, who are now called ... Native Americans.

And how come nobody has pointed out that username24's picture implied a very unlikey, if not impossible conjunction of all 9 (or 8 or 10) planets?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 07:16 PM
Saluki's Avatar
Saluki Saluki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Springfield, Illinois, USA
Posts: 745
Send a message via Yahoo to Saluki
Default

I thought this guy was banned. Has anyone contacted Mr. Plait?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 08:13 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 7,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisM
Quote:
Originally Posted by novaderrik
the only fault i can find with your drawing is the order of the planets around the Jupiter/Mercury binary system...
I noticed that too... It should be something like:

Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto ...
Not to mention fixing NIPtune.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 08:33 PM
Ara Pacis's Avatar
Ara Pacis Ara Pacis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: between the candle and the star.
Posts: 2,115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by formulaterp
RBG,

They are called Indians. Unless you meant the folks who were native to the Americas, who are now called ... Native Americans.
Or indigenous peoples. I don't think any americans are native as anthropologists seem almost positive that humans evolved in Africa. I've heard that pre-columbian inhabitants of north america like to be called by the name of their nation: Cherokee, Sauk, Chippewa, Navajo, etc. just like the south and meso american pre-columbian inhabitants are called Inca, Aztec, etc. Some anthropologists think that even these inhabitants were not the first transplants but that another immigration occured previously that died out in some or all areas.

It might also be noted that the people we currently call Indians may not have been the first people to inhabit India.
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 09:20 PM
jfribrg jfribrg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 40N 75W mag 4.1 sky at best
Posts: 1,229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by formulaterp
RBG,

They are called Indians. Unless you meant the folks who were native to the Americas, who are now called ... Native Americans.
That depends on how PC you want to be. The new Smithsonian museum is the Museum of the American Indian, in part because the various tribes couldn't agree on a better name.

Reminds me of a deaf person who once told me "I am Deaf. I am not hearing imparied, i and not audiologically challenged; I am Deaf. just because somebody how can hear perfectly thinks that the term Deaf is somehow offensive doesn't make it so."


Now back to the topic. We have 8 planets, and we have known about them for 150 years or so. My thought about why Pluto and this new planet, which we can call Planet X for lack of a better name , are so far off the ecliptic is because they are so far away. I thought the tendency to orbit near the ecliptic was due to the tidal bulge of the Sun. The farther away you get, the less important this becomes, so that by the time you get past Neptune, it its influence is trivial. Maybe I'm completely wrong about this. If so, I'm sure I will be told so very soon.
__________________
Yo Adrian. The Phillies won the Series.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 09:28 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,749
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher
Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisM
Quote:
Originally Posted by novaderrik
the only fault i can find with your drawing is the order of the planets around the Jupiter/Mercury binary system...
I noticed that too... It should be something like:

Mercury Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto ...
Not to mention fixing NIPtune.
glad I wasn't the only one to spot that. and no, Saluki, he's not banned. he managed to improve the actions that were getting him close. at least, usually--we'll have to see if he responds to our responses.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 09:32 PM
azazul azazul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rio Hondo, TX
Posts: 368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RBG
So what do you call Indians, now?
I personally call them native americans.
__________________
www.csphysmath.com
BAUT Team Stats
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 11:14 PM
Ilya's Avatar
Ilya Ilya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azazul
Quote:
Originally Posted by RBG
So what do you call Indians, now?
I personally call them native americans.
Do you really think they appreciate being named after a Spaniard?
__________________
Fiction has to be plausible. Reality is under no such constraint.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 11:18 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,749
Default

Italian, actually--Amerigo Vespucci isn't exactly a Spanish name.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2005, 11:20 PM
formulaterp formulaterp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 325
Send a message via Yahoo to formulaterp
Default

Correct. While his voyages were sponsored by Spain, Vespucci (like Columbus) was very much an Italian.

Besides, how is it better for them to be named after Indians?
Reply With Quote
  #