Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Reload this Page VLT: Bad David Darling?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-August-2005, 12:17 PM
Kemal's Avatar
Kemal Kemal is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 220
Default VLT: Bad David Darling?
On British Astronomer David Darling's web site he writes this about the Very Large Telescope(VLT):

Quote:
If there were cars on the Moon, the Very Large Telescope would be able to read their number plates.
Taken from this site: http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/V/VLT.html

That sounds like a serious exaggeration to me. What say ya'll?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-August-2005, 12:36 PM
jt-3d's Avatar
jt-3d jt-3d is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,786
Default
Well he's either lying or exaggerating. 'taint gonna happen. Now my scope will do that but ya know, it's all secret and stuff.
__________________
You're a coward and a liar and a thOOF - Bart Sibrel
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-August-2005, 12:40 PM
papageno's Avatar
papageno papageno is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Saxony
Posts: 3,270
Send a message via MSN to papageno
Default
As JayUtah explained on the apollohoax forum:
Quote:
Often scientists involved with extreme engineering problems do make statements like this in order to inspire awe and appreciation, and not with the intent that they be taken as literally true.

A 200 meter aperture at a wavelength of 500 nanometers gives an angular resolution of 0.00000000305 radian, or 0.000629 arcsecond. At lunar distance that's just under four feet. So no, it does not seem possible that the array can read license plates on the moon.
__________________
papageno


"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes)

"It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh)

"I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-August-2005, 03:24 PM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,278
Default
Maybe the lunarians use use really big number plates on their moon cars, and mount them on the roof for easier viewing from Earth.
8-[
Reply With Quote
Reply

« My Idea for Classifying Planets | No methane lakes on Titan »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:56 AM.

Contact Us - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today