Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-September-2002, 06:28 PM
hullaballo hullaballo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 32
Default

OK BA explain how this one happens

http://www.msnbc.com/news/803934.asp?0na=x2338180-
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-September-2002, 06:33 PM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 8,637
Default

The explanation is on the Hubble Heritage page.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-September-2002, 07:25 PM
David Hall David Hall is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 2,689
Default

Wow, that's even better than the Cartwheel Galaxy. I've always liked photos of strange galactic shapes. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

BTW, except for the first sentence, the text of the MSN newsbrief is word-for-word the same as the Hubble Heritage explanation. It appears to be a simple cut-and-paste news release.
__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-September-2002, 07:41 PM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 8,637
Default

I put a mention of this image in my most recent newsletter (Issue 22). The woman who put the image together is an undergrad here at SSU, is on my team and is a friend of mine. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-September-2002, 12:51 AM
Wiley Wiley is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 899
Default

Great pic, y'all. Thanks.

(I now have something to shoot for.)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-September-2002, 01:58 PM
nebularain's Avatar
nebularain nebularain is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Central MD
Posts: 2,049
Default

The Discovery Channel website also delves into this one.
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/afp/20020902/hubble.html
__________________
"As I lay beneath the Southern Cross, the stars tell more than I could" . . . David Meece
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-September-2002, 03:34 PM
David Hall David Hall is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 2,689
Default

I don't doubt it will be on the APOD very soon, with lots of interesting links to follow.

This link has a hi-res .jpg version of the image.
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/wfpc/

And the full-size .tif image can be found here:
http://heritage.stsci.edu/gallery/galindex.html
__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2002, 02:43 AM
JS Princeton JS Princeton is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Princeton
Posts: 2,189
Send a message via AIM to JS Princeton
Default

Hey guys, don't look now, but can you find the ring in the ring?

It has really intrigued some of the profs here at Princeton. Is it internal to the galaxy or another ring behind it? Maybe the image of the galaxy on the second way around a closed topological universe [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img]) In any case, it's peculiar enough that someone in the department gave Arp a call. I'll tell you what is discovered if an answer ever comes up.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2002, 04:44 AM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 8,637
Default

I saw that too. I wonder though; it may just be a spiral in the background with a star formation ring. There are lots of galaxies like that. The arms may be too faint to see in the image. Remember, the picture isn't data. It's been heavily processed. Since it's a Heritage image the data are probably public. I'll ask my friend tomorrow and see.

Someone gave Arp a call? Care to drop a name? You don't have to, but I'm curious.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2002, 04:54 PM
JS Princeton JS Princeton is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Princeton
Posts: 2,189
Send a message via AIM to JS Princeton
Default

It was Bohdan Paczynski who was talking about doing that. It's obviously not a high-priority item right now. More of just side-chatter.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2002, 05:54 PM
traztx traztx is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dallas
Posts: 561
Send a message via Yahoo to traztx
Default

Yup... it's on APOD... and they mention the ring inside the ring as being a coincidental ring galaxy that is farther away.

I wonder if the central stars are spewing out tendrils of "solar wind" that is dark and sparse for 10s of millions of years before it coalesces into stars, causing the ring shape. The ring looks like a lot of arcs, as if the stars are in trajectories that will pull them back to the middle.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2002, 10:31 PM
JS Princeton JS Princeton is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Princeton
Posts: 2,189
Send a message via AIM to JS Princeton
Default

This is a quote from one of my profs, Jim Gunn, about the ring within the ring...

Quote:
It is VERY red for an object at what must be a relatively small redshift, and probably like the intended subject of the picture
has a very blue ring; most of the objects within the ring are pretty red, and it seems likely that the cause is dust in the ring. One could say that it is a classical ring galaxy in which one is looking along the trajectory of the ringmaker (presumably the elliptical in the middle), but the ring is REALLY symmetrical; no off-center nucleus or anything, and there should be no dust if it is a classical Toomre reverberation ring. Peculiar.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-September-2002, 11:32 PM
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
The Bad Astronomer The Bad Astronomer is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Posts: 8,637
Default

Yeah, it's a weird object, no question. I'm not surprised Paczinsky is interested.

The data are public, and can be downloaded from the HST archive. The filters used were pretty wide passband, to minimize exposure time, I'm sure. This object was observed as a Heritage object. In other words, it wasn't some scientist's data, it was observed strictly to make this picture. Since Heritage doesn't get much Hubble time, they used wide bands to soak up as much light as they could in the shortest time. So I am not sure how scientifically useful the data are other than to look at the galaxy's morphology: its shape and structure.

Looking back on this post, I can see I haven't lost the use of the jargon. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img] I could even jargonify this more, but I'll spare everyone.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-September-2002, 01:14 AM
gethen's Avatar
gethen gethen is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: the great white north
Posts: 2,399
Default

Definitely a non-physicist thought here, but this picture reminds me of some pics I saw on a recent visit to an astrophysics lab where folks were working on the effects of gravitational lensing. Massive object in the center causing apparently repeating views of objects behind it in a somewhat ringlike pattern.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-September-2002, 03:08 AM
ljbrs ljbrs is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 679
Default

The galaxy is absolutely gorgeous!

However, I will not put it on my desktop, because my favorite galaxy, NGC1365 holds that desktop spot ad infinitum.

ljbrs [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]
__________________
"There is in the universe neither center nor circumference." Giordano Bruno Born 1548. Torched 1600.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-September-2002, 09:35 AM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,674
Default

Quote:
On 2002-09-09 22:08, ljbrs wrote:
The galaxy is absolutely gorgeous!

However, I will not put it on my desktop, because my favorite galaxy, NGC1365 holds that desktop spot ad infinitum.

ljbrs [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]
NGC1365 is also nice, but my desktop belongs to NGC 4414.
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today