Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 13-December-2004, 04:52 PM
John L John L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas!
Posts: 1,069
Default

Space.com has an article with several mission ideas that may go nuclear and launch before JIMO. The idea is, if the technology works and is ready to roll, why wait until 2015 to launch JIMO when there are several other missions that could benefit from it.

I like the communication orbiter missions to the Moon and Mars, and the asteroid mission. Long term communication assets will be invaluable to future lander missions to both worlds, and any mission that hops from asteroid to asteroid, possibly even dropping landers, is a good idea to me. Call it Super-NEAR.
__________________
...and we'll be saying a big hello to all intelligent life forms everywhere; and to everyone else out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together, guys...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 13-December-2004, 05:07 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Marlborough, MA
Posts: 14,979
Default

That sounds good to me too. I think that understanding the structure and mineral resources on asteroids is one of the most valuable short-term things we could be doing right now.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 14-December-2004, 12:37 AM
aeolus's Avatar
aeolus aeolus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 522
Send a message via MSN to aeolus
Default

The next generation communication project sounds most exciting. And given the enormous amounts of information we learned from the NEAR mission, doing another, improved version of that would be just as worth while.

Given the present situation in regards to funding for space research, with NASA having to stretch each of their precious dollars, I just cannot beleive the first suggestion was even suggested- "with no specific science goal or destination." ??? What on Earth (or 'any other non-specific planetary body', in their case) were they thinking?
__________________
~ cogito cogito ergo cogito sum ~

Nothing in life is good nor bad; thinking makes it so.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today