Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-July-2005, 08:49 AM
anaklinskywalkar1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The proposed membrane theory of gravitation is of type Kaluza-Klein with non-compactified fourth spatial dimension and delivers Newton’s law of gravitation in a direct way and explains light bending, Shapiro effect and perihelion advance of Mercury with the same accuracy as the GR. There is no reason to believe that the speed of gravity is greater than the speed of light. From the point of view of the proposed Cosmic Membrane Theory the General Relativity of Albert Einstein is a projection of the 4-dimensional space into the 4-dimensional spacetime. The constant moc2 replaces the constancy of c. Spontaneous creation of matter seems to be possible, because the resistance of the existing matter inside the membrane is producing a great amount of energy. A new cold dark matter candidate (CDM) is presented. It is a thickening of the cosmic membrane caused by ordinary matter leading to a long-reaching violation of the 1/r-potential.

×

can anyone know about it.......
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2005, 03:46 AM
GOURDHEAD GOURDHEAD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,194
Default

Quote:
It is a thickening of the cosmic membrane caused by ordinary matter leading to a long-reaching violation of the 1/r-potential.
What could thickening of the cosmic membrane possibly mean?
__________________
For those inclined to oppose human meddling with the structure of the universe or the composition and configuration of objects and groups of objects within the universe, consider:
Whether there is a limit to the magnitude of a modulation of chaos below which order remains invariant? Or, is order but a fiction invented by perspectives applied over finite, however large, time intervals?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2005, 08:48 AM
anaklinskywalkar1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

thank u gourdhead for u r replay
can u give me animation explaining m-theory
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-July-2005, 01:56 PM
GOURDHEAD GOURDHEAD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,194
Default

Quote:
can u give me animation explaining m-theory
Not really. I have not accepted that m-theory is viable. My previous question was more semantical that theoretical. If I understand branes (membranes) we are talking about n-1 surface analogues of n-dimensional geometries where n is greater than 3 not including time. Since I am unable to comprehend this, I stick to 3 Euclidean dimensions of space and "pretend" that no other spatial dimensions exist. To speak of a surface thickening violates the definition and concept of my limited comprehension of "surface".

In an equally wild bit of speculation I am toying with a concept which I am incapable of adequately describing. For now I refer to it as space compactification, (thickening?) athough I choke on the oxymoronism. It may be better dealt with as Higgs field compactification within Euclidean 3-space as a support for the Shmoo version of the Higgs field. The Shmoo interacts with Euclidean 3-space to produce non-Euclidean energy manifestations and paths including quantum states that, among other things, allows gravity to be a higher order time derivative of geometry mediated by mass as a lower order time derivative assuming non-continuous (quantum) functions can have derivatives. Charge and sub-charge, if such exists, would be yet lower order time derivatives of 3-space.
__________________
For those inclined to oppose human meddling with the structure of the universe or the composition and configuration of objects and groups of objects within the universe, consider:
Whether there is a limit to the magnitude of a modulation of chaos below which order remains invariant? Or, is order but a fiction invented by perspectives applied over finite, however large, time intervals?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today