|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Hubble Press Release
![]() Quote:
__________________
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool. -- Richard Feynman |
|
||||
|
That's impossible.
To create an interferometer you must know the distance between the telescopes more accurately than the wavelenght used. In visible light it is nanometers. There is other, worser problems like the fact that you must collect the light of the telescopes in one point with mirrors in extreme accuracy. Experts may explain it better. So no optical Earth/space interferometers. On the other hand, true space-borne interferometers are possible. Radio interferometry is much easier and has been done with satellites.
__________________
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool. -- Richard Feynman |
|
||||
|
If the manage to build the 100 meter optical telescope (OWLT), it should be able to get fairly sharp images of several of the larger asteroids. By the time it is built, we will have good closeups of Ceres and Vesta from the "Dawn" mission, but Pallas, and several other big ones will still be waiting to be imaged.
On the other hand, asteroids, while being pretty cool to people like us, are probably not that interesting to people assigning telescope time. Notice how long Hubble's been up there, and it's only just now that we get these images of Ceres.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak |
|
||||
|
It may be fading, but I've been told there used to be a definite caste system in astronomy, with prestige accruing in direct proportion to the distance of the objects being studied. So astronomers studying clusters of galaxies would far "outrank" those who study asteroids.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
||||
|
Hubble has studied many Main Belt asteroids as well as Kuiper Belt objects. It has also discovered several moons around them.
__________________
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool. -- Richard Feynman |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Very cool.
__________________
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. |
|
||||
|
Actually this is at least the second time when Hubble has studied Ceres. Last time it was imaged with the WFPC2 camera. Less details were visible, of course.
__________________
Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself. The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool. -- Richard Feynman |
|
|||
|
Ice on asteroids, eh? That would definitely make colonizing the asteroid belt easier.
- Maha "iceteroid" Vailo
__________________
When you get down to it, Science answers how. Religion answers why. - hippietrekx |