Quote:
|
Originally Posted by grant hutchison
Approximately, yes. The logarithmic visual magnitude scale has been tied to illuminance measured in lux for zero magnitude, so it's just a matter of raising 2.512 to the power of the magnitude, which will give you how much brighter or dimmer than zero magnitude your star is, and then multiplying the lux value. I don't have the conversion figure to hand, but I should be able to dig it out.
Grant Hutchison
|
At visual magnitude zero, a star gives us 3.92e-9 erg/(square centimeter second Angstrom) at 5500 A, or 3.81e-23 watt/(square meter Hertz). These values change somewhat for stars with extreme colors, since the standard V filter band has appreciable width so the flux-weighted mean wavelength changes. This calibration traces to comparison of bright stars (especially Vega) with laboratory blackbodies.
An easy rule is that a V=0 star gives us (above the atmosphere) about 1000 photons per square centimeter per second per Angstrom of bandwidth. (As I work it out, the nmber is closer to 1084).
These absolute calibrations are still uncertain at the level of a percent or slightly less. The magnitude scale is internally better defined than this, which is one reason it continues in use for many purposes - at this point, some measurements would see an increase in error bars if converted to energy flux.