Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-November-2005, 12:05 PM
Andre Andre is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Netherlands & Germany
Posts: 80
Default Supernova led to Mammoth extinction?

Richard Firestone, a nuclear expert, has been working for years now on the hypethesis that the North American megafauna (mastodons, woolly mammoths etc) went extinct due to a supernova.

He presented this idea on two recent congresses so it's getting some media coverage now:

http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/...xtinction.html

Quote:
BERKELEY, CA – A distant supernova that exploded 41,000 years ago may have led to the extinction of the mammoth, according to research conducted by nuclear scientist Richard Firestone of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab).

(...)

Firestone and West believe that debris from a supernova explosion coalesced into low-density, comet-like objects that wreaked havoc on the solar system long ago. One such comet may have hit North America 13,000 years ago, unleashing a cataclysmic event that killed off the vast majority of mammoths and many other large North American mammals. (...) It has long been established that human activity ceased at these sites about 13,000 years ago, which is roughly the same time that mammoths disappeared.

They also found evidence of the supernova explosion’s initial shockwave: 34,000-year-old mammoth tusks that are peppered with tiny impact craters apparently produced by iron-rich grains traveling at an estimated 10,000 kilometers per second. These grains may have been emitted from a supernova that exploded roughly 7,000 years earlier and about 250 light years from Earth.

“Our research indicates that a 10-kilometer-wide comet, which may have been composed from the remnants of a supernova explosion, could have hit North America 13,000 years ago,” says Firestone. “This event was preceded by an intense blast of iron-rich grains that impacted the planet roughly 34,000 years ago.”
I'm familiar with evidence. It's there. One element in particular is striking, the unexplained atmospheric radio-active carbon14 spikes in those periods (the last one actually 12,770 years ago) suggesting that something indeed was going on.

My questions:

What would the experts think of such a mechanism?

Is there a known supernova that matches the possible range of parameters and that could be close enough for causing all of these phenomenons?



***
Off the record -not astronomic- , but just in case somebody wondered: the continental Siberian mammoths seemed totally unaffected by the 13,000 years event and continued to thrive at least another 1500-2000 years, the oldest dated fossils being around 11,200 calendar years. After that, a relict population survived even longer on Wrangel island, the youngest fossils being dated some 4000 calender years ago. So whatever happened, Firestone's event was not responsible for the complete late-Pleistocene megafauna extinction.
__________________
Quid est ergo tempus.
Augustinus
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-November-2005, 07:20 PM
Dragon Star's Avatar
Dragon Star Dragon Star is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lake Mary, FL
Posts: 3,747
Send a message via MSN to Dragon Star
Default

I am not sure, but aren't most mammoths found frozen to death with food still in their mouths?

Or was that just used as historical proof for the movie "Day After Tomorrow?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-November-2005, 07:47 PM
Andre Andre is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Netherlands & Germany
Posts: 80
Default

That's an extreme persistent fairy tale that can be debunked in a number of ways. We have a lot of detailed reconstructions now. Very fascinating but unfortunately rather off thread. I'd hoped to discus the possible physical impact of a nearby supernova on life on Earth and learn whether or not this could be a feasible scenario.
__________________
Quid est ergo tempus.
Augustinus
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-November-2005, 11:37 PM
Crum's Avatar
Crum Crum is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northwest United States
Posts: 70
Default

Quote:
They also found evidence of the supernova explosion’s initial shockwave: 34,000-year-old mammoth tusks that are peppered with tiny impact craters apparently produced by iron-rich grains traveling at an estimated 10,000 kilometers per second. These grains may have been emitted from a supernova that exploded roughly 7,000 years earlier and about 250 light years from Earth.
Iron-rich grains survived 10,000 kilometer per second entry into our atmosphere and peppered the tusks of mammoths? Does anybody else see a problem with this? And where are the other "peppered" relics of this era? Or did these meteorites have some preference for mammoth tusks?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 01:45 AM
Nowhere Man's Avatar
Nowhere Man Nowhere Man is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southfield MI
Posts: 2,237
Default

This is also being duscussed in this here thread.

Fred
__________________
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 04:29 AM
aurora's Avatar
aurora aurora is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,064
Default

Amazingly selective supernova. Wonder why caribou and musk oxen are immune?
__________________
"I'm as accurate as any psychic. And I'm a cartoon!" -- Squidward

"Arrrgh, the laws of physics be a harsh mistress!" -- Bender
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 04:24 PM
tracer tracer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Silicon Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 2,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crum
Iron-rich grains survived 10,000 kilometer per second entry into our atmosphere and peppered the tusks of mammoths? Does anybody else see a problem with this?
Maybe by "iron-rich grains", they meant "superheated balls of plasma that happen to be rich in fully-ionized iron atoms"?
__________________
The truth, as always, is more complicated than that.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-November-2005, 06:25 PM
Tunga Tunga is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 190
Default

I thought the research paper was interesting especially the Carbon14 spikes. Carbon 14 is produced by collisions of very high speed nuclear particles (GCRs) with nitrogen atoms in Earth's atmosphere, converting the nitrogen into a radioactive form of carbon. (Sounds like alchemy)
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ar/cardat.html
Supernovas generate an explosion of very high energy GCRs. Nearby supernova events within 2,000 light years from Earth can produce a spike in Carbon 14 on Earth. Other recent research papers have been correlating carbon 14 spikes observed in ice cores to supernova events.
__________________
Author of the Impact website at:
http://personals.galaxyinternet.net/tunga/
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-November-2005, 03:35 AM
AK's Avatar
AK AK is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 384
Send a message via ICQ to AK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crum
Iron-rich grains survived 10,000 kilometer per second entry into our atmosphere and peppered the tusks of mammoths? Does anybody else see a problem with this? And where are the other "peppered" relics of this era? Or did these meteorites have some preference for mammoth tusks?
I'm more struck by the allegation that a comet 10km in diameter is the culprit, yet only the North American/South American megafauna were affected? With an impactor that large you're looking at something more like global sterilization than local extinction of only large mammals...
__________________
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today