Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2006, 05:33 AM
Knowledge_Seeker's Avatar
Knowledge_Seeker Knowledge_Seeker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 505
Default Selling Out NASA, or a clever budget problem solver? You Decide

First Take A Look At The Picture On The Link Below:

Click Here

then after viewing it, im sure most of you have seen it before and have had some thoughts about it.

i for one am in favor of letting companies advertise on things like the shuttle or the ISS because it means that less of the government money is spend on NASA.

then the budget crisis is somewhat solved and it helps both the company and NASA
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2006, 05:39 AM
Candy's Avatar
Candy Candy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 12,671
Default

I love the link!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2006, 05:53 AM
Knowledge_Seeker's Avatar
Knowledge_Seeker Knowledge_Seeker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 505
Default

no problem, and CHICAGO!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2006, 06:18 AM
Halcyon Dayz's Avatar
Halcyon Dayz Halcyon Dayz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NLD - Sol III
Posts: 1,619
Wink Sponsorship

Considering the price of a launch, it wouldn't really help much.
And all that paint would make the stack at least half a tonne heavier.
__________________
An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it.
Join the Illuminati
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2006, 06:42 AM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 1,501
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan Send a message via MSN to Tuckerfan
Default

They tried it once before, with putting the Last Action Hero ad on the main tank, the movie bombed, so advertisers being a superstitious lot don't want to try it again. Mind you, that didn't hurt Rutan selling ad space on SS1 (and the M&M's Mike Melville let out in the cockpit were product placement). Of course, this was pretty much predicted by the movie Fight Club, if you'll recall.
__________________
We want our children to go to the planets. Burt Rutan 6/21/04
Tuckers! Science! Automotive Oddities! Boycott Trek XI! Building my hot rod with the help of the intarwebs Those who would delay scientific progress for a little temporary prosperity shall have neither.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 30-January-2006, 07:51 AM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckerfan
They tried it once before, with putting the Last Action Hero ad on the main tank[...]
Omni, 1994: Selling America on orbiting ads: Madison Avenue commercializes space in its distinctive fashion - advertising on rockets


But, here's a problem:

Testimony of Robert Lorsch given at a field hearing on "President's New Space Vision" Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation

Quote:
[Assistant Administrator for NASA] Mr. Fanseen greatly supported this program and worked over years to help me "get it off the ground" with no success. It was rejected primarily because there was no way for NASA to see any money, since monies raised for a government agency would first go to the United States Treasury and could not be directly allocated to the space agency. Additionally there was a belief that the shuttle belonged to the American people and no one had a right to commercialize it.
Lorsch proposes million-dollar plaques of support on the shuttle cabin walls. I wonder if many companies would pay so much for so little. Really, who watches shuttle flights? Better to spend the million on a few seconds of TV ads.

Edit: Oh, I just remembered a case where lots of eyeballs were exposed to a shuttle flight: the Challenger disaster, repeated endlessly on the news for day after day. Would that be a time, say, Intel would want a prominent "Intel Inside" logo burned into millions of brains?
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today