Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ken G
Yeah, too bad NASA is making no effort to maintain observational capability in that spectral range, it slipped under the radar, as it were.
|
As I see it, there are a bunch of issues involved. The UV community of observers is not as cohesive and politically effective as, say, the X-ray astronomers (anachronistic as this kind of wavelength chauvinism is). On top of that, the far-UV range is really essential for a few problems (intergalactic medium, reionization of helium, certain elemental abundances in hot stars and star-forming galaxies) and much less important for lots of others. Lyman-limit absorption means that the only things you can see at redshifts z>0.25 are certain quasars, leaving the FUV out of the race toward galaxy evolution except as a low-z comparison set (a favorite of mine, BTW). Then toss in the fact that mirror coatings tend to be useful either in the FUV or elsewhere, and anything that works here will look like a niche mission... It took a good long time and redesigns to get FUSE funded and flown in the first place. Used to be named Lyman, which would have made a really cool combination if someone could have combined Lyman and Spitzer data in one project.
(Truth in advertising - this from someone not too proud to analyze galaxy spectra taken by the Voyagers, and whose second FUSE paper shows up in print - press date is today. Hey, there it is, lead article for June!)