|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
However, David Higgins, an Australian amateur astronomer, has also been working on the light curve of (6406) 1992 MJ, and the binary nature of it is not so convincing...
Higgins light curve (11kb, 735 x 484) verses Casulli light curve (11kb, 1024 x 768) DATA
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
From the article cited in topic Huge Asteroid to Fly Past Earth July 3: Quote:
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
|||
|
The only objection anyone has to Behrands 'claim' is the use of the word 'Probable' - could just be a French-English trasnlation thing but there is nothing probable about this target being a binary.
Other than direct visual or radar observation, the only thing that can 'guarantee' a binary is mutual events (like the LC events in Extrasolar planet searches). Other scientists (Harris, Pravec, Kaasalienan and others) have shown that binarity is possible but the LC characteristics have been shown to only indicate very elongated asteroids (by direct observation) and no binaries to date. Cheers David Higgins |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|