Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 19-July-2006, 10:11 AM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default Are Proxima and Alpha Centauri Gravitationally Bound?

Title: Are Proxima and Alpha Centauri Gravitationally Bound?
Authors: Jeremy G. Wertheimer, Gregory Laughlin

Using the most recent kinematic and radial velocity data in the literature, we calculate the binding energy of Proxima Centauri relative to the centre of mass of the Alpha Centauri system. When we adopt the centroids of the observed data, we find that the three stars constitute a bound system, albeit with a semi-major axis that is on order the same size as Alpha Centauri AB's Hill radius in the galactic potential. We carry out a Monte Carlo simulation under the assumption that the errors in the observed quantities are uncorrelated. In this simulation, 44% of the trial systems are bound, and systems on the 1-3 sigma tail of the radial velocity distribution can have Proxima currently located near the apastron position of its orbit. Our analysis shows that a further, very significant improvement in the characterisation of the system can be gained by obtaining a more accurate measurement of the radial velocity of Proxima Centauri.

Read more (531kb, PDF)
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 19-July-2006, 01:03 PM
Eroica's Avatar
Eroica Eroica is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dubh Linn
Posts: 3,719
Default

Thanks for that, Blob; I look forward to reading it.
__________________
- Learn a lot teaching others.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 19-July-2006, 01:09 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Marlborough, MA
Posts: 14,979
Default

Fraser seems to have ToSeek'd you on this one Blob. Interesting paper.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 19-July-2006, 03:41 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,311
Default

Yes. Please continue the discussion here.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 19-July-2006, 07:19 PM
Fraser's Avatar
Fraser Fraser is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Courtenay, BC, Canada
Posts: 11,322
Default

Phew, finally. Blob... you are way too quick.
__________________
Fraser Cain
Publisher
Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 20-July-2006, 10:50 AM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default

Hehe,
I'll ease back a little, to let others have a chance...

Quote:
It's an emerging rule of thumb that suggests that if you get a group of 100 people online then one will create content, 10 will "interact" with it (commenting or offering improvements) and the other 89 will just view it.
Source
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today