|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Title: Are Proxima and Alpha Centauri Gravitationally Bound?
Authors: Jeremy G. Wertheimer, Gregory Laughlin Using the most recent kinematic and radial velocity data in the literature, we calculate the binding energy of Proxima Centauri relative to the centre of mass of the Alpha Centauri system. When we adopt the centroids of the observed data, we find that the three stars constitute a bound system, albeit with a semi-major axis that is on order the same size as Alpha Centauri AB's Hill radius in the galactic potential. We carry out a Monte Carlo simulation under the assumption that the errors in the observed quantities are uncorrelated. In this simulation, 44% of the trial systems are bound, and systems on the 1-3 sigma tail of the radial velocity distribution can have Proxima currently located near the apastron position of its orbit. Our analysis shows that a further, very significant improvement in the characterisation of the system can be gained by obtaining a more accurate measurement of the radial velocity of Proxima Centauri. Read more (531kb, PDF)
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`... |
|
||||
|
Phew, finally. Blob... you are way too quick.
__________________
Fraser Cain Publisher Universe Today - Free space news delivered by email every weekday. |
|
||||
|
Hehe,
I'll ease back a little, to let others have a chance... Quote:
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|