|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Here is a remarkable article on the significance of Dec. 21 2012 to the Mayan calendar system. Well written and appears to be well researched.
Oops post edited to add link. Thanks for pointing that out. ops: http://www.levity.com/eschaton/Why2012.html |
|
||||
|
I can't imagine why. Celestial alignments of objects at large distances from the Earth (stars, Milky Way etc.) have never been scientifically shown to directly affect life on Earth. Planetary alignments happen all the time with no devastating effects to life on Earth. This Mayan alignment is fascinating, but there is no science to back up the idea that it will have any effects on the Earth.
But if you want a different view I did come across this link which does a nice job of explaining the point of view of the people that think something may result from the alignment: http://www.survive2012.com/why2012.html |
|
|||
|
From the dgruss23's link above:
"Popular for the millennia prior to the 1830s, is the more obvious idea of catastrophism. Unfortunately it has been discounted by modern scientific techniques, which require processes to be recreated in a laboratory, or at least viewed in nature within a recent timeframe. The art of making educated guesses based on the physical remnants of ancient disasters is no longer acceptable." Seems when science doesn't find the evidence to support claims, the believer of those claims rationalizes that the science is old, rigid, unwilling to look at the discoveries the believer thinks he/she has looked at. "Viewed in nature within a recent timeframe"? Does that mean more than 5 billion years ago? Certainly this guy isn't counting the theory of how the Moon hit the Earth, several known mass extinctions, recurrent ice ages, supervolcanoes, or asteroid impacts. The fact that the evidence shows pole reversals to be benign must just be that scientists are unwilling to 'believe'. The myth of the Mayan calendar showing the world is re-created every 400 and how many or so years is one of those supposed 'real' things because the Mayan society was devastated by the European invasion about the same time as the predicted event. But think about it. The world was not destroyed and recreated. Only the Mayan society. There is no evidence it happened 400 and however many years before Cortez or 400 and however many years before that. It's an interesting story but it does not hold up to scrutney.
__________________
The real news, including science news corporations may not allow on stations they own. http://www.democracynow.org/ |
|
||||
|
Oh man, I get the feeling we're going to be hearing from '2012 Doomsayers' for the next nine years
It doesn't help that the Mayan's picture-writings leaves itself open to gross misinterpretation by those looking for impending doom.Maybe we should get a jump on this right now. Does anyone live near a university with a Mayan archaelolgy department? Maybe we can ask a professor to give us a brief FAQ about 2012 to use in debunking the doomsayers that shall inevitably appear soon. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
DR. MICHAEL E. MOSELEY He is more andean, but has done study there and would know who to ask for it. BA: Do i have your permission to ask him to come on here and give a brief FAQ or have him give me one and to post it here if he says yes? He might not say yes and just say "I do not have time right now" but it could not hurt trying. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
One point that the 2012 people seem to leave out is that the longest unit of time in the mayan calendar (and I believe the longest unit of time in ANY calendar) is some 60 million years long, the alautun. Why have a unit of time that long if you thought the universe was gonna end in 2012??? Another thing they forget is that the mayans, and the aztecs, thought that all kinds of horrible things would happen, and the universe might end every 52 years unless certain rites were performed. Those rites haven't been performed for 500 years and we are still here...
__________________
"Ignorance has caused more calamity than malignity" H.G. Wells "Getting lost is part of exploring." Uniqua in "Backyardigans-Heart of the Jungle" |
|
||||
|
I read the first article...and while I am impressed at the research and ingenuity of the Mayans, I do not think this heralds the end of the world.
As Rift pointed out, the calendar rolls over, not ends. And besides, if there were any cataclysm that would strike the Mayans, it would be localised within their region. The doomsayers of 2012 can rant and rave of what they want, but we ain't dead yet from mythological disasters. Perhaps on the solstice of 2012, I'll look outside and watch the skies, but without a hardhat. ~Josh
__________________
"4th Law of Modern Thermodynamics: Where Mihoshi is, Chaos Reigns." ~W. Hakubi "Gun control is hitting your target; Recycling is reloading your brass." ~ Lex of Dirty Work. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
:wink: |
|
||||
|
I can't see how the Mayan calendar's rollover, or whatever the correct term, has any more astronomical significance than any other artificially imposed calendar, ie: the calendar we use. Predictions of doom and I2K panics were based on nothing more than the count of years reaching 2000, and since 2000 wasn't even the end of the millenium... The Mayan calendar appears to me to be the same--man imposes an artificial count on the passage of the astronomical year, but should not expect the cosmos to pay any attention.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Although you bring up a point that should be remembered, the descendents of the Mayan (especially in remote regions) still keep a lot of the old traditions alive, they are usually an interesting mishmash of mayan and catholic beliefs. The universe ending in 2012 is still hogwash though :P
__________________
"Ignorance has caused more calamity than malignity" H.G. Wells "Getting lost is part of exploring." Uniqua in "Backyardigans-Heart of the Jungle" |
|
|||
|
I once read that when we were first using computers for astronomy calculations, for calculating solstices and equinoxes, etc, that we checked their data with ancient Mayan calculations to check the computers accuracy! Anyone know if that is true?
I'm sure glad I live in the age of the calculator. [/code] |
|
|||
|
Hi,
I'm the guy from the Survive 2012 website, which is linked to earlier in this discussion. Just thought I'd let you know that I'm not a doomsday nut. As 2012 approaches there will be a lot of the millennial madness of a few years ago, but hopefully I will be dismissing it rather than fueling it. All I believe is that a global cataclysm will happen one day. Maybe tomorrow, maybe in 10,000 years, but one day it will. And nobody has prepared for it, and I doubt many ever will. My concern is the survival of the human species, in its current form. I like us! The 2012 date is the last old doomsday date left. If any ancient prediction is ever to come true, the Mayans and 2012 is the last chance. For me it's a great way fo bringing my concerns for the safety of out species to a wider audience. I severely doubt anything will happen in Dec 2012. But of all the random dates in our future, with everything else being equal, it stands out as the strongest possibility for the "when" question, and I'll be in a safe spot, just in case, come that time. Rob Bast Melbourne, Australia |