|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
From here: Quote:
__________________
"A mystic is a person who is puzzled before the obvious but who understands the nonexistent." -- Elbert Hubbard |
|
||||
|
Some objects are named according to set rules, such as the initial detection of satellites and asteroids, the 2006AK34 sort of name. When the object is confirmed, the discoverer gets a say in choosing a name, subject again to rules like non-duplication. Stars are normally referred to by their number in some catalogue, again with rules for the components of multiple systems.
__________________
"The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head" Terry Pratchett |
|
||||
|
The only place that that name has any meaning, or will ever get used is in the files of the company you buy the certificate from. It's a scam.
On the other hand, it's a remarkably romantic gift for a girl/boyfriend. "Here, I love you so much I bought you a star, and had it named after you!" ![]() |
|
||||
|
This is a follow-up question about the IAU, but I was wondering, when they choose a name for a new planet, for example, what do they do, if anything, about the problem of pronunciation in various languages? For example, suppose they give a name starting with a "V", when there are many languages in the world that have no "V". Or for example, suppose that they approve a name for a new planet that includes two consonants in a row (for example, Sedna), when there are languages, like Chinese notably, that don't allow consonant clusters? Or are these names only used by astronomers when communicating in English?
__________________
As above, so below |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Perhaps not directly relevant, but here's a nice table of planet names in many dozen different languages: Planetary Linguistics
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
In answer to your question, the name is the name. If people have difficulty pronouncing it that's just tough. Even English speakers have problems. How many people have you heard pronounce Uranus correctly? ![]() |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
As above, so below |
|
||||
|
Wollery,
I understand what you're getting at. Those sounds are affricates, like "sh" and "ch" in English, and, according to Wikipedia: "Affricate consonants begin as stops (most often an alveolar, such as [t] or [d]), but release as a fricative such as [s] or [z] (or, in a couple of languages, into a fricative trill) rather than directly into the following vowel." I have never considered those to be clusters, but maybe they can be. It is true that they're spelled with two letters in English, but there are languages where they aren't. I think in Turkish they write /tS/ as a c with a thingie underneath it (whatever you call that). So it doesn't seem clear to me that, for example in English, "s" is a single consonant whereas "sh" is a cluster. In IPA, the first is written [s] whereas the other is a funny mark [ʃ] if you can read it. So I think this may be an issue of how we define cluster.
__________________
As above, so below |