|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Title: The Chemical Evolution of Helium in Globular Clusters: Implications for the Self-Pollution Scenario Authors: A. I. Karakas, Y. Fenner, Alison Sills, S. W. Campbell and J. C. Lattanzio We investigate the suggestion that there are stellar populations in some globular clusters with enhanced helium (Y ~ 0.28 to 0.40) compared to the primordial value. We assume that a previous generation of massive Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars have polluted the cluster. Two independent sets of AGB yields are used to follow the evolution of helium and CNO using a Salpeter initial mass function (IMF) and two top-heavy IMFs. In no case are we able to produce the postulated large Y ~ 0.35 without violating the observational constraint that the CNO content is nearly constant. Read more (PDF) Title: Helium enhancements in globular Cluster stars from Asymptotic Giant Branch star pollution Authors: A. Karakas1, Y. Fenner, Alison Sills, S. W. Campbell and J. C. Lattanzio Using a chemical evolution model we investigate the intriguing suggestion that there are populations of stars in some globular clusters (e.g. NGC 2808, Omega Centauri) with enhanced levels of helium (Y ~ 0.28 to 0.40) compared to the majority of the population that presumably have a primordial helium abundance. We assume that a previous generation of massive low-metallicity Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars has polluted the cluster gas via a slow stellar wind. We use two independent sets of AGB yields computed from detailed models to follow the evolution of helium, carbon, nitrogen and oxygen in the cluster gas using a Salpeter initial mass function (IMF) and a number of top-heavy IMFs. In no case were we able to fit the observational constraints, Y > 0.30 and C+N+O ≈ constant. Depending on the shape of the IMF and the yields, we either obtained Y & 0.30 and large increases in C+N+O or Y < 0.30 and C+N+O ≈ constant. These results suggest that either AGB stars alone are not responsible for the large helium enrichment or that any dredge-up from this generation of stars was less than predicted by standard models. Read more (39kb, PDF)
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`... |