|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
A research team led by a Penn State University astronomer has used NASA's Hubble Space Telescope to discover and photograph one of the smallest objects ever seen around a normal star beyond our Sun. Weighing in at 12 times the mass of Jupiter, the object is small enough to be a planet. The conundrum is that it's also large enough to be a brown dwarf, a failed star.
Read more See more ![]() Expand (1016kb, 2400 x 3000) Credit: NASA, ESA and K. Luhman (Penn State University) Position (2000): R.A. 11h 063m 29s.3 Dec. -77° 37' 34".0 Constellation: Chamaeleon
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`... |
|
|||
|
If the object is above the deuterium-burning limit then it is a brown dwarf. If it's below, then as it is orbiting a star, it is a planet according to the Position Statement on the Definition of a "Planet" of the IAU's Working Group on Extrasolar Planets.
"Luhman and others advocate that an object is a planet only if it formed from the disk of gas and dust that commonly encircles a newborn star." But that criteria is not in the IAU position statement, which tends to suggest that is disputed!. (A lot of people think you should base a definition on what an object is, not how it came to be.) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|