Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 21-September-2006, 07:41 PM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default Hubble Finds Hundreds of Young Galaxies

Quote:
Astronomers analysing two of the deepest views of the cosmos made with the Hubble Space Telescope have uncovered a gold mine of galaxies, more than 500 that existed less than a billion years after the Big Bang. This sample in the constellation Fornax represents the most comprehensive compilation of galaxies in the early universe, researchers said. The discovery is scientifically invaluable for understanding the origin of galaxies, considering that just a decade ago early galaxy formation was largely uncharted territory. Astronomers had not seen even one galaxy that existed when the universe was a billion years old, so finding 500 in a Hubble survey is a significant leap forward for cosmologists. This Hubble Space Telescope image shows 28 of the more than 500 young galaxies the researchers uncovered in their analysis of two Hubble surveys.
Position (J2000): R.A. 3h 32m 40s.0 Dec. -27° 48' 00"

Read more
Attached Images
File Type: jpg web.jpg (18.6 KB, 17 views)
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 27-September-2006, 04:17 AM
jimmarsen jimmarsen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ridgefield Park, NJ
Posts: 25
Default

It is interesting to recall a NASA press release from a year ago that seems to conflict with the current one:

NASA finds "Big Baby" Galaxies in Newborn Universe

It was about the discovery of a galaxy, HUDF-JD2, which was estimated to have a redshift of z ~ 6.5 putting it at a distance that "represents an era when the universe was only 800 million years old" with eight times more mass than the Milky Way and composed of stars that were "remarkably mature".

However, the following paper finds that the redshift of HUDF-JD2 is z ~ 2.2:

A systematic search for very massive galaxies at z > 4
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 27-September-2006, 12:57 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Marlborough, MA
Posts: 14,979
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmarsen View Post
It is interesting to recall a NASA press release from a year ago that seems to conflict with the current one
What makes you think that NASA is a clearinghouse that vetts all conclusions drawn from research done with tools they've launched?
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today