|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Read more
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`... |
|
|||
|
It is interesting to recall a NASA press release from a year ago that seems to conflict with the current one:
NASA finds "Big Baby" Galaxies in Newborn Universe It was about the discovery of a galaxy, HUDF-JD2, which was estimated to have a redshift of z ~ 6.5 putting it at a distance that "represents an era when the universe was only 800 million years old" with eight times more mass than the Milky Way and composed of stars that were "remarkably mature". However, the following paper finds that the redshift of HUDF-JD2 is z ~ 2.2: A systematic search for very massive galaxies at z > 4 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|