Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 24-January-2002, 07:21 AM
nraider nraider is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1
Default

I currently own a Celestron 9 1/4 sct and am considering a Obsession 18". I live in Napa , Ca. and am concerned if light pollution will negate the larger aperature or if I will still gain "seeing" despite the the amount of light pollution here. With my current 9 1/4" I can see some of the brighter galaxies ,just make out the faint images of the Little dumbell nebula and the crab. How much improvement will I get with an 18" at this location based on the info I just gave.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 24-January-2002, 11:58 PM
aurorae aurorae is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 321
Default

Quote:
On 2002-01-24 02:21, nraider wrote:
I currently own a Celestron 9 1/4 sct and am considering a Obsession 18". I live in Napa , Ca. and am concerned if light pollution will negate the larger aperature or if I will still gain "seeing" despite the the amount of light pollution here.
The answer is it depends on the type of object you are looking at. However, for most deep sky objects aperature wins regardless of whether you are in the suburbs or in the outback.

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26-January-2002, 05:04 PM
photonbucket photonbucket is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Great Yarmouth, England, UK
Posts: 5
Default

Hi everyone-Im Thomas and I live in the UK. Some of you may have seen me from other forums.

Another thing that effects a scopes performance according to the text books is the focal ratio. In light polluted areas a higher focal ratio tends to cut through the pollution better. However I used to own an F4 16" scope which I used from my light polluted home and it seemed to be fine.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 28-January-2002, 09:51 PM
Russ's Avatar
Russ Russ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 1,583
Default

Rules of Telescopy:

1) More aperture is better.

End of rules. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]
__________________
It's just one of those damn things of which there are many few. -- Dan Blocker
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2002, 12:43 AM
Hale_Bopp Hale_Bopp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 614
Default

Actually, I was at a star party one night when it was extremely clear, but extremely windy. My little 5 inch SCT was one of the few instruments stable enough to give decent views. While all the large telescopes (up to 36") were worthless, I had a line waiting to look through my 5". The skies were clear and everyone was impressed with what you can see through a small telescope (we saw 7 galaxies in a cluster in Leo in one field of view!)

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2002, 01:19 AM
ljbrs ljbrs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 679
Default

I have a nice little 3-1/2 inch Questar which is great for planetary astronomy near my home (despite the light pollution).

If I want more aperture, etc., I peek through my friends' scopes (most of which are huge) at my astronomy club's dark site.

Belonging to a wonderful astronomical club makes life very pleasant. I get the best of both worlds!

ljbrs [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img]
__________________
"There is in the universe neither center nor circumference." Giordano Bruno Born 1548. Torched 1600.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 29-January-2002, 03:36 AM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,581
Default

Quote:
I have a nice little 3-1/2 inch Questar...
To say the Questar 3 1/2 is "nice" is a gross understatement. Beautifully crafted instrument that vastly out-performs its aperture! Wish I could afford one. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_cool.gif[/img]

_________________
TANSTAAFL!

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Kaptain K on 2002-01-28 22:37 ]</font>
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today