Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-October-2006, 06:23 PM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default The universe is egg shaped

Title: Ellipsoidal Universe Can Solve The CMB Quadrupole Problem
Authors: L. Campanelli, P. Cea, L. Tedesco

The recent three-year WMAP data have confirmed the anomaly concerning the low quadrupole amplitude compared to the best-fit Lambda CDM prediction. We show that, allowing the large-scale spatial geometry of our universe to be plane-symmetric with eccentricity at decoupling or order 10-2, the quadrupole amplitude can be drastically reduced without affecting higher multipoles of the angular power spectrum of the temperature anisotropy.

Read more (212kb, PDF)
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-October-2006, 06:31 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 7,576
Default

I got as far as "The recent three-year WMAP data have confirmed the anomaly concerning the "
Is there an English translation?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-October-2006, 06:49 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,464
Send a message via AIM to Doodler Send a message via MSN to Doodler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
I got as far as "The recent three-year WMAP data have confirmed the anomaly concerning the "
Is there an English translation?
In layman's English.

"We've figured out why we're getting asymmetrical readings along the major axis."

By the way, what is the plural form of "axis"?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-October-2006, 06:56 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 11,793
Default

Quote:
BEDEVERE: And that, my lord, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped.
ARTHUR: This new learning amazes me, Sir Bedevere. Explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
BEDEVERE: OF course, my Liege ...
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-October-2006, 07:03 PM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default

While the WMAP measurements generally agree with a spherical model of the observable universe, the measurements taken on the largest scale reveal that the radiation is too low - The `CMB Quadrupole Problem`...
This low quadrupole amplitude anomaly however ties in with the best-fit Lambda-cold dark matter predictions, and can be explained by saying that the universe topology is squashed in one direction by about one per cent.
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-October-2006, 07:03 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodler View Post
In layman's English.

"We've figured out why we're getting asymmetrical readings along the major axis."

By the way, what is the plural form of "axis"?
Don't axe me. Oh... axes.

But, the world wants to know: what kind of egg? Chicken? Shark? Human? Is it a symmetric one? A prolate ellipsoid?
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-October-2006, 07:04 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 7,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodler View Post
"We've figured out why we're getting asymmetrical readings along the major axis."
So it is shape as opposed to interference, instrument quality, unknowns, etc.?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodler View Post
By the way, what is the plural form of "axis"?
Why aks me? My dictionary says "axes" but doesn't have a plural for "ax" or "axe".
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-October-2006, 09:48 PM
Cougar's Avatar
Cougar Cougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 4,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01101001 View Post
But, the world wants to know: what kind of egg? Chicken? Shark? Human? Is it a symmetric one? A prolate ellipsoid?
With an eccentricity of 1/100, the best fit appears to be a dinosaur egg.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-October-2006, 10:04 PM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default

Hum,
while some sauropods did lay roundish eggs, most dino eggs that i have seen are greatly squashed...

The best fit is a slightly oblate beachball, (er, a very big beach ball)...
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...

Last edited by Blob; 02-October-2006 at 10:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2006, 12:29 AM
Squink Squink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blob View Post
This low quadrupole amplitude anomaly however ties in with the best-fit Lambda-cold dark matter predictions, and can be explained by saying that the universe topology is squashed in one direction by about one per cent.
Bowing to external pressure, is it?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2006, 01:16 AM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default

Hum,
well it's all just a bit of a mystery, no one really knows what is causing the deformation in our local universe (observable universe). The deformation may be due to topology defects that were enlarged during the early inflationary phase, or it could just be the chance distribution of DM (locally or at cosmological distance) that is warping the measurements.
The deformation probably disappears if it were possible to look at a larger (very large) portion of the universe.
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2006, 01:55 AM
Nowhere Man's Avatar
Nowhere Man Nowhere Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southfield MI
Posts: 1,816
Default

Hard-boiled, fried, or scrambled?

This corner of the universe is certainly addled...

Fred
__________________
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2006, 02:24 AM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default

Hum,
i found an easy to read article on how it could be cooked.

Quote:
Campanelli's team speculates on what could have forced the universe out of spherical symmetry. A slight cosmic magnetic field — about a billionth as strong as Earth's — could do the job. Moreover, the scientists write, this is about the right strength "to account for the observed magnetic fields in galaxies and galaxy clusters."
Read more
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2006, 01:42 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,464
Send a message via AIM to Doodler Send a message via MSN to Doodler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
So it is shape as opposed to interference, instrument quality, unknowns, etc.?
Note I didn't specify shape, just that they'd figured out why it wasn't obviously the same in all directions.

Jargonese can be worse than Bureaucrapese at times, and I don't like overreaching my translations.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2006, 02:14 PM
Mister Earl's Avatar
Mister Earl Mister Earl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,067
Default

Now what exactly is it that is being deformed, here? Space itself? Or the distribution of observeable matter?
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2006, 09:32 PM
Cougar's Avatar
Cougar Cougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 4,013
Default

Man, they must have been in a hurry to get this publication out there. I do wish they would run such papers by a technical editor (such as myself ) beforehand. It's pretty embarrassing when you've got errors like the following:
Quote:
At large scale, however, some anomalous features has been reported.

This results is generic regardless of the origin of eccentricity.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2006, 09:34 PM
Cougar's Avatar
Cougar Cougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 4,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Earl View Post
Now what exactly is it that is being deformed, here?
The large-scale spatial geometry of our universe.

Hope this helps.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2006, 10:20 PM
Cougar's Avatar
Cougar Cougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 4,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blob View Post
...can be explained by saying that the universe topology is squashed in one direction by about one per cent.
Or more directly, the shape of the Surface of Last Scattering (which we observe as the CMB) is this slightly off-spherical ellipsoid. Basically, they're saying that this is one possible explanation for the anomalous reading. Raise your hand if you think it's probably something else.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2006, 11:22 PM
Blob's Avatar
Blob Blob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cougar View Post
Man, they must have been in a hurry to get this publication out there.
Hum,
this works is fairly old, The authors had posted version 1 of the paper in June ...
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`...
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-October-2006, 07:06 PM
punkrockbong151's Avatar
punkrockbong151 punkrockbong151 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: glen allen, virginia
Posts: 79
Send a message via AIM to punkrockbong151 Send a message via MSN to punkrockbong151 Send a message via Yahoo to punkrockbong151
Default

look. the universe has no definite shape, nor does it resemble one, it is expanding at different speeds at different parts, i am still by the way, still trying to beleive if if i beleive even in that, because part of me wants to say that the universe is and always has been infinite, msg me if u want to discuss
Reply With Quote