|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
IMAGE 1 IMAGE 2 IMAGE 3 Title: Reconstructed Density and Velocity Fields from the 2MASS Redshift Survey Authors: Pirin Erdo¢gdu, Ofer Lahav, John P. Huchra., Matthew Colless, Roc M. Cutri, Emilio Falco. Teddy George, Thomas Jarrett, D. Heath Jones, Lucas M. Macri, Jeff Mader, Nathalie Martimbeau, Michael A. Pahre, Quentin A. Parker, Anais Rassat, Will Saunders We present the reconstructed real-space density and the predicted velocity fields from the Two Mass Redshift Survey (2MRS). The 2MRS is the densest all-sky redshift survey to date and includes about 23,200 galaxies with extinction corrected magnitudes brighter than Ks = 11.25. Our method is based on the expansion of these fields in Fourier-Bessel functions. Within this framework, the linear redshift distortions only affect the density field in the radial direction and can easily be deconvolved using a distortion matrix. Moreover, in this coordinate system, the velocity field is related to the density field by a simple linear transformation. The shot noise errors in the reconstructions are suppressed by means of a Wiener filter which yields a minimum variance estimate of the density and velocity fields. Using the reconstructed real-space density fields, we identify all major superclusters and voids. At 50 h-1 Mpc, our reconstructed velocity field indicates a back-side infall to the Great Attractor region of vinfall = (491 ± 200)(β/0.5) kms-1 in the Local Group frame and vinfall = (64 ± 205)(β/0.5) kms^-1 in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) frame and β is the redshift distortion parameter. The direction of the reconstructed dipole agrees well with the dipole derived by Erdo¢gdu et al. (2006). The misalignment between the reconstructed 2MRS and the CMB dipoles drops to 13. at around 5000 kms^-1 but then increases at larger distances. Read more (676kb, PDF)
__________________
`Irony` actually does mean `metal like`... |
|
|||
|
In this survey it looks up to 600 mil. light years, SLOAN Digital Survey looks even further as far as I know. Considerng those vast distances, what we see from Earth is becoming "obsolete" picture : distant objects have different positions then we see them from Earth.
I would compare it to tracking group of planes just based on their sounds: one can exactly track position of all sounds, but trying to do draw their 3D positions exactly means to take into consideration speed ot the sound , espec. for further planes. My point is : do we in those studies intend to develop model (3D map) of the Space as instant picture (all objects in their positions to the same point of time, which would include prediction of position of moving distant objects) OR the model will present Space as we see it from Earth as of today ? Tomas |