Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Science and Space > Astronomy
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2003, 10:28 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is online now
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,009
Default Why We Watch the Skies

Why We Watch the Skies

Inspiring essay, though I'm not sure he has all his facts straight.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2003, 11:08 PM
crazy4space crazy4space is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kansas City,MO USA 94*36.25 min west / 39*4.10 min north
Posts: 156
Default Re: Why We Watch the Skies

[quote="ToSeek"]Why We Watch the Skies

We watch for the same reason that we visit this board - we love to be inspired. :
__________________
My initials are on the moon, my name is on Mars and Earth is my planet of origin.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2003, 03:43 AM
tracer tracer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Silicon Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 2,130
Default Re: Why We Watch the Skies

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToSeek
I'm not sure he has all his facts straight.
Here's one he didn't:

"When spectroscopes were attached to telescopes, astronomers were able to discover the compositions, temperatures, brightness, and, eventually, distances of the stars."

Spectroscopes weren't used to make any insterstellar distance measurements at first. Trigonometic parallax was. True, later generations were able to apply so-called "spectroscopic parallax" techniques to guesstimate the intrinsic luminosity of known star types (and hence the distances to these stars), but these guesstimations are all built upon trigonometric parallax measurements to nearby "example" starts of their type.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2003, 04:20 AM
dgruss23's Avatar
dgruss23 dgruss23 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 4,290
Default

Is this one accurate?:

His work (Galileo), with that of Copernicus, Kepler, and Newton, demonstrated that the Sun, not the Earth, was the center of the solar system and that the stars were not lights on a celestial sphere but suns like our own in a vast ocean of space.

Was there anything specific in the work of any of these great astronomers that scientifically demonstrated that the stars must be other Sun's? The stars were still at a single fixed distance in the model of Copernicus.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today