|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Greetings
<disclaimer> I'm a newbie amateur </disclaimer> I was browsing through my stars & planets guide looking at the southern cross (crux) and the stars around it. My attention was particularly drawn to the two bright stars next to it in Centauris, alpha and beta that are particlularly visible here. The guide tells me that alpha centauri is a (trinary?) system containing the closest star to sol, alpha proxima, and that this is a flare star, changing in magnitude rapidly over a relatively short period of time. My questions: although I know Sol is supposed to have plenty of life left in her yet, what about neighbouring stars? I think alpha centauri is ~4ly away. I don't know if being a 'flare' star means it is unstable or nearing the end of its lifecycle, but if it (or any other neighbouring star) was to explode/supernova/whatever, could our solar system be bombarded by dangerous levels of radiation? Are there many old/unstable stars within ~50ly radius of us? I'm not trying to be alarmist, it is just a point of interest for me.
__________________
<3 |
|
|||
|
Red dwarf stars like Proxima Centauri have lifespans in the hundreds of billions of years. We'll be loooooooooooooooonnnnnnnggg gone before even the first of them enters middle age. Many red dwarfs are flare stars. I myself don't know the mechanism, but they commonly exhibit flare activity that puts our own sun to shame. There's nothing unstable about them.
Alpha and Beta Centauri are G-class stars very similar to our own Sun. I don't remember exactly, but I think they are a little older than Sol. G-class stars ending their lives swell up into red giants and expel large clouds of gas for a while, then gracefully die out and become white dwarfs. They do not go supernova. It takes a very massive star to do that. There was a thread a while back about the possible threat of supernovae. It looks like it's not much of one at all. Read it here: http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=3590
__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere |
|
|||
|
Of course, no chat on supernovae risks should be without the infamous eta c. picture:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap980816.html ![]()
__________________
~~ ><>><> ~~ ><,,> ><,,> ...`;=;p d;=;' /\/\^/\ ^^ ^/\/\_ Democracy Now! - The lost art of investigative news reporting. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
According to this link, the flares of Proxima are caused by a very chaotic magnetic field.
__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere |
|
||||
|
F, G and K don't have a heck of a lot between them.
I think you also need to be a bit careful with the notation. Greek letters are reserved for Bayer designations. Beta Centauri is otherwise known as Hadar and sits 4° west of Alpha Centauri. When distinguishing between the stars that are so close that they have the same Bayer designation, numbers are used. GSC 9007:5849, the G2V type star, is designated Alpha-1 Centauri. GSC 9007:5848, the K1V type star, is designated Alpha-2 Centauri. A similar thing happens in Orion. There are two stars designated Theta Orionis. SAO 132314, otherwise known as Trapezium a O6pe :-? type star is Theta-1 Orionis, while SAO 132321, a O9.5Vpe :-? type star is Theta-2 Orionis. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
and contorted in the turbulent convective zone just below the surface of the sun. For cool stars, the convective zone is much deeper, and the stars show an increase in both the number and energy of the flares and sunspots. So it is not surprising that Proxima Centauri is a flare stare. Interestingly, there is a significant relation between the age of a flare star and the luminosity of its brightest flares. Luckily, Proxima Centauri seems to be the same age as its companion stars (5-6 billion years or so).
__________________
http://www.as.utexas.edu/~kurtis |
|
||||
|
That would make sense. In hotter stars, material too deep in ionises completely, losing all its electrons, and so it cannot carry heat. Therefore, it cannot participate in convection and so the convection currents are smaller causing less magnetic stuff. In cooler stars, material can hold onto its electrons even deeper down so the convective zone can be bigger. This gives rise to more chaotic current which make the magnetic field go all evil on us.
|
|
|||
|
[quote="kurtisw"]
Quote:
and contorted in the turbulent convective zone just below the surface of the sun. This is a very interesting point. My encyclopedia of astronomy (circ 2001) says that we have found the north magnetic pole of the sun but not the south. Seems as though it is very difficult to locate. I wondered how we ever found it at all with the sun rotating at different speeds. i.e. the north and south poles rotate at a different speed than the equator. This leads me to wonder do all stars rotate at different speeds? Personal note: The drive from Flagstaff on 89A going south down to Sonora is one of the most beautiful places on the earth. ![]()
__________________
My initials are on the moon, my name is on Mars and Earth is my planet of origin. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
~~ ><>><> ~~ ><,,> ><,,> ...`;=;p d;=;' /\/\^/\ ^^ ^/\/\_ Democracy Now! - The lost art of investigative news reporting. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|