|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
When was the eclipse for May 31 found out about, I heard that up until the middle of 2002 it was not shown on any calanders is this true, I thought they new of these things in advance.
Also they was a link a while back showing every time this special link date (18 years) on a pages past and future anyone know the link. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
|||
|
It's also possible you saw a list of TOTAL solar eclipses. If that is the case, the upcoming eclipse would not have been listed as it is an annular eclipse.
Rob
__________________
"Crackpot theories 1 : Regular theories a billion." Fry |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
My eclipse book lists total and annular eclipses separately, and I would go along with that. If the Sun's not completely obscured, it's not a total eclipse.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
||||
|
Just for clarification - the difference has to do with the distance between the Earth and the Sun (aphelion vs perihelion) and the distance between the Earth and the Moon (apigee vs perigee) or both?
__________________
"As I lay beneath the Southern Cross, the stars tell more than I could" . . . David Meece |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I would say, too, that the distance of the Moon is far more significant than that of the Sun, since the former varies much more than the latter.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|